2016
DOI: 10.3732/apps.1500127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsatellite markers for hoop‐petticoat daffodils (Narcissus sect. Bulbocodii; Amaryllidaceae)

Abstract: Premise of the study:Microsatellite markers were developed using hoop-petticoat daffodils (Narcissus sect. Bulbocodii; Amaryllidaceae) to aid in the taxonomic revision of the section, and to further evaluate their broad applicability for daffodil cultivar identification.Methods and Results:Three hundred fifty-one primer pairs were developed using a commercial service. Nineteen polymorphic and repeatable markers were developed by screening 67 of these primer pairs. Of these, 11 chosen markers were used to scree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In difficult profiles showing stutters the allele scoring followed the method of the manual routine of Pfeiffer et al (2011) with slight modifications. This approach is considered reliable over automated scoring to reduce noise in difficult loci due to polyploidy (Bhandawat et al 2016;Cărăbuș et al 2015;Könyves et al 2016;Pfeiffer et al 2011). Therefore, depending on their putative quality, the peaks in the chromatograms were considered as alleles.…”
Section: Microsatellite Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In difficult profiles showing stutters the allele scoring followed the method of the manual routine of Pfeiffer et al (2011) with slight modifications. This approach is considered reliable over automated scoring to reduce noise in difficult loci due to polyploidy (Bhandawat et al 2016;Cărăbuș et al 2015;Könyves et al 2016;Pfeiffer et al 2011). Therefore, depending on their putative quality, the peaks in the chromatograms were considered as alleles.…”
Section: Microsatellite Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In difficult profiles showing stutters the allele scoring followed the method of the manual routine of Pfeiffer et al (2011) with slight modifications. This approach is considered reliable over automated scoring to reduce noise in difficult loci due to polyploidy (Bhandawat et al 2016;Cărăbuș et al 2015;Könyves et al 2016;Pfeiffer et al 2011). Therefore, depending on their putative quality, the peaks in the chromatograms were considered as alleles.…”
Section: Microsatellite Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In difficult profiles showing stutters the allele scoring followed a similar method to the manual routine of Pfeiffer et al (2011) with slight modifications. This approach is considered reliable over automated scoring to reduce noise in difficult loci due to polyploidy (Pfeiffer et al 2011b, Cărăbuș et al 2015, Bhandawat et al 2016, Könyves et al 2016. Therefore, the peaks in the chromatograms were considered as alleles depending on their putative quality.…”
Section: Microsatellite Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%