2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-022-01342-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsatellite markers as a tool for active germplasm management and bridging the gap between national and local collections of apple

Abstract: Simple sequence repeat (SSR) microsatellite markers have been extensively used to identify duplication and analyse genetic diversity in germplasm collections of apple. Here, we present findings from the use of a standard set of SSR loci in the managed repropagation of a significant international germplasm collection: the UK National Fruit Collection (NFC). A subset of eight SSR loci was deemed sufficient to distinguish all apart from the clonal relatives across a sample of 1995 accessions, with a single except… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The success of genotyping for identification (Method S1b) is dependent upon having reference DNA fingerprints available for large collections of verified-identity cultivars, such as the reference specimens available in genebanks (including the USDA National Plant Germplasm System Apple Collection in Geneva, NY), heirloom orchards, and breeding collections (Gutierrez et al, 2020). Small sets of microsatellite markers were used to characterize apple cultivar collections (Gross et al, 2012;Guilford et al, 1997), which provided genotypic datasets that then served as reference panels for identifying unknown cultivars (Venison et al, 2022;Volk et al, 2021aVolk et al, , 2021b, cultivar synonyms, and mislabeled accessions (e.g., Evans et al, 2011;Gross et al, 2012). These genotypic datasets were useful but limited because of difficulties such as comparing datasets among laboratories (Evans et al, 2011;Gross et al, 2012;Venison et al, 2022).…”
Section: Apple Cultivar Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The success of genotyping for identification (Method S1b) is dependent upon having reference DNA fingerprints available for large collections of verified-identity cultivars, such as the reference specimens available in genebanks (including the USDA National Plant Germplasm System Apple Collection in Geneva, NY), heirloom orchards, and breeding collections (Gutierrez et al, 2020). Small sets of microsatellite markers were used to characterize apple cultivar collections (Gross et al, 2012;Guilford et al, 1997), which provided genotypic datasets that then served as reference panels for identifying unknown cultivars (Venison et al, 2022;Volk et al, 2021aVolk et al, , 2021b, cultivar synonyms, and mislabeled accessions (e.g., Evans et al, 2011;Gross et al, 2012). These genotypic datasets were useful but limited because of difficulties such as comparing datasets among laboratories (Evans et al, 2011;Gross et al, 2012;Venison et al, 2022).…”
Section: Apple Cultivar Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small sets of microsatellite markers were used to characterize apple cultivar collections (Gross et al, 2012;Guilford et al, 1997), which provided genotypic datasets that then served as reference panels for identifying unknown cultivars (Venison et al, 2022;Volk et al, 2021aVolk et al, , 2021b, cultivar synonyms, and mislabeled accessions (e.g., Evans et al, 2011;Gross et al, 2012). These genotypic datasets were useful but limited because of difficulties such as comparing datasets among laboratories (Evans et al, 2011;Gross et al, 2012;Venison et al, 2022). Despite limitations, these efforts resulted in establishing the cultivar identities of hundreds of heirloom trees in the North American landscape (Routson et al, 2009;Volk et al, 2021aVolk et al, , 2021bVolk & Henk, 2016).…”
Section: Apple Cultivar Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Germplasm evaluation and genetic diversity in mango using SSR markers gain significant advancement for evaluation of hybrids or cultivars, determination of genetic variations and conservation of germplasm [7]. SSR markers have widely used for identification of the domestication and movement of germplasm [19]. Genetic diversity evaluation in candidate cultivar using SSR molecular technology is based on SSR-PCR amplifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Germplasm evaluation and genetic diversity in mango using SSR markers gain significant advancement for evaluation of hybrids or cultivars, determination of genetic variations and conservation of germplasm [7,34]. SSR markers have widely used for identification of the domestication and movement of germplasm [35]. Genetic diversity evaluation in candidate cultivar using SSR molecular technology is based on SSR-PCR amplifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%