2019
DOI: 10.5958/0974-0112.2019.00046.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsatellite maker based intervarietal variability study in Indian cauliflower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…sub-cluster-IIa) and few nodes in sub-cluster IVa had genotypes particular to maturity group such as sub-cluster IIa (KT-17, KT-13-01, KT-25 and KT-22 of late group) and three nodes of sub-cluster IVa (one, DC-321, DC-310, DC-385, DC-309; two: DC-402, CCM � HR and DC-3023-2; three: DC-522, DC -383, DC-325 and DC-308), (iii) in one subcluster, the genotypes of mid-late and late group were placed together, and (iv) the genotypes of broccoli and cabbage were grouped alongwith cauliflower and they could not make separate clusters. Similar results were earlier reported by Vanlalneihi et al [44] while studying genetic diversity using 26 SSR markers in 48 genotypes of three maturity groups of Indian cauliflower. The SSR markers could corroborate the agro-morphological grouping to some extent with PLOS ONE respect to Indian and Snowball cauliflower only.…”
Section: Molecular Diversitysupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…sub-cluster-IIa) and few nodes in sub-cluster IVa had genotypes particular to maturity group such as sub-cluster IIa (KT-17, KT-13-01, KT-25 and KT-22 of late group) and three nodes of sub-cluster IVa (one, DC-321, DC-310, DC-385, DC-309; two: DC-402, CCM � HR and DC-3023-2; three: DC-522, DC -383, DC-325 and DC-308), (iii) in one subcluster, the genotypes of mid-late and late group were placed together, and (iv) the genotypes of broccoli and cabbage were grouped alongwith cauliflower and they could not make separate clusters. Similar results were earlier reported by Vanlalneihi et al [44] while studying genetic diversity using 26 SSR markers in 48 genotypes of three maturity groups of Indian cauliflower. The SSR markers could corroborate the agro-morphological grouping to some extent with PLOS ONE respect to Indian and Snowball cauliflower only.…”
Section: Molecular Diversitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The SSR markers have been well employed in understanding the genetic variations Brassica species for diversity studies [20,23,41,42]. Earlier, RAPD, ISSR and SSR markers have been used for linkage analysis in cauliflower for characterization of self-incompatible lines [43], genetic diversity analysis [44] and linkage analysis with downy mildew [45,46] and black rot [47]. The SSRs with high polymorphism are useful for parent selection, mapping of specific traits and their introgression.…”
Section: Molecular Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sub-cluster (A 2 ), genotypes of mid-late group (e.g., DPCaY-7 and DPCAY-9) were placed together while certain sub- clusters had genotypes particular to late maturity group as depicted in sub-cluster B 2 (Pusa Snowball K-1 and Pusa Snowball K-25) . Vanlalneihi et al [ 49 ] and Rakshita et al [ 46 ] also observed agro-morphological and molecular diversity in diverse set of genotypes from different maturity groups of Indian cauliflower. Cauliflower genotypes have vast ecological distribution, strong environmental adaption, capacity to survive, and evolutionary consequences all contribute to its expanded genetic diversity [ 50 ] on account of its sensitivity to temperature for curding and thereby, distribution of genotypes to different maturity groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%