2007
DOI: 10.1039/b610311a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microporous structure and enhanced hydrophobicity in methylated SiO2 for molecular separation

Abstract: Methylated microporous silica with high thermal stability and tuneable hydrophobicity was obtained by acid-catalysed sol-gel hydrolysis and condensation of mixtures of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) and methyltriethoxysilane (MTES). The gels exhibited a trend towards smaller ultramicropores with increasing methyl content, while in addition some supermicropores were formed with sizes of around 2 nm. For low MTES concentration, dilution prior to gelation and ageing resulted in materials with clearly smaller ultr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The separation factor of the BTESE/MTES membrane probably suffers from the relatively large contribution of pores [ 1 nm, despite the fact that its average pore size is the lowest of the three membrane types. Similar observations of bimodal pore size distributions caused by MTES were made in adsorption studies on methylated silica gels [24]. For the purely bridged precursor membranes even the comparatively small difference between BTESM and BTESE membranes leads to a dramatic difference in selectivity for MeOH/H 2 O mixtures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The separation factor of the BTESE/MTES membrane probably suffers from the relatively large contribution of pores [ 1 nm, despite the fact that its average pore size is the lowest of the three membrane types. Similar observations of bimodal pore size distributions caused by MTES were made in adsorption studies on methylated silica gels [24]. For the purely bridged precursor membranes even the comparatively small difference between BTESM and BTESE membranes leads to a dramatic difference in selectivity for MeOH/H 2 O mixtures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, the significantly lower He densities of MTMS-and PTMS-as compared to BTESE-and BTMSH-derived networks indicate that the first ones contained larger pore fractions that are inaccessible to He (pores inaccessible to He suppress the measured He density). This has also been reported for methylated silica elsewhere [3] Information on the pore entrance sizes can be obtained by comparing the uptake of methanol, 1-propanol and cyclohexane in Figure 3. These molecules are at least partially hydrophobic and their uptake is therefore not expected to depend on pore chemistry; hydrophobic molecules can enter hydrophilic and hydrophobic channels with the same ease due to the lack of polar interaction.…”
Section: Pore Volume Entrance Size and Surface Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, terminal methyl (-CH3) and phenyl (-C6H5) groups have also been reported to increase the effective pore opening size in membrane applications as compared to inorganic silica [22] and 3 methyl groups can increase the total pore volume [3]. Organic groups in terminal position increase the network hydrophobicity by sticking out at the pore surface [3,4,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations