1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4660(199801)71:1<61::aid-jctb785>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microporous hollow fibres for carbon dioxide absorption: mass transfer model fitting and the supplying of carbon dioxide to microalgal cultures

Abstract: : A method of supplying to photosynthetic algal cultures was devel-CO 2 oped based on mass transfer measurements of through microporous hydro-CO 2 phobic hollow Ðbres for various gas and liquid Ñow rates. A mathematical model was derived to describe the mass transfer. The designed hollow Ðbre module led to overall mass transfer coefficient values ranging from 1É26 ] 10~3 to 2É64 ] 10~3 cm s~1. Higher efficiencies of the transmission were obtained CO 2 at high liquid Ñow rates and low gas Ñow rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
30
1
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(3 reference statements)
4
30
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies (73,74) have been undertaken to compare k L a values obtained under bubbling (at different gas and liquid flow rates and at distinct bubble sizes) and under diffusion through hollowfiber membranes (of different areas and distinct construction materials); k L a typically increases with increasing liquid tangential flow rate, because of thinning of the liquid boundary layer. When comparing the rate of mass transfer obtained under bubbling or by diffusion (with all other operating conditions remaining similar) (75), it was observed that k L a values were higher in the latter case: an overall volumetric coefficient for CO 2 transfer of 1.48 × 10 -2 min -1 was found for a hydrophobic membrane, 1.33 × 10 -2 min -1 for a hydrophilic membrane and 7.0 × 10 -3 min -1 for plain bubbling (see Table 4).…”
Section: Transport Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Studies (73,74) have been undertaken to compare k L a values obtained under bubbling (at different gas and liquid flow rates and at distinct bubble sizes) and under diffusion through hollowfiber membranes (of different areas and distinct construction materials); k L a typically increases with increasing liquid tangential flow rate, because of thinning of the liquid boundary layer. When comparing the rate of mass transfer obtained under bubbling or by diffusion (with all other operating conditions remaining similar) (75), it was observed that k L a values were higher in the latter case: an overall volumetric coefficient for CO 2 transfer of 1.48 × 10 -2 min -1 was found for a hydrophobic membrane, 1.33 × 10 -2 min -1 for a hydrophilic membrane and 7.0 × 10 -3 min -1 for plain bubbling (see Table 4).…”
Section: Transport Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No examples have been reported pertaining to surface aeration in closed systems, probably owing to the huge areas that would be involved. Conversely, membranemediated transfer has already been tested in closed systems (74)(75)(76).…”
Section: Co 2 Transfer Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One example is that comparative studies (21,22) have indicated that microporous hollow fibers instead of plain bubbling enhance CO 2 mass transfer. Both passive and active modes have been devised and tested to improve transfer of CO 2 through the interface between the gaseous mixture and the liquid medium culture.…”
Section: Co 2 Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%