2020
DOI: 10.3390/nano10102012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microporous Carbon Nanoparticles for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Abstract: Rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) are emerging as some of the most promising next-generation battery alternatives to state-of-the-art lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) due to their high gravimetric energy density, being inexpensive, and having an abundance of elemental sulfur (S8). However, one main, well-known drawback of LSBs is the so-called polysulfide shuttling, where the polysulfide dissolves into organic electrolytes from sulfur host materials. Numerous studies have shown the ability of porous car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The one-step synthesis method and electron beam lithography have inherent shortcomings compared with the seed-mediated growth method. For example, the one-step synthesis method has a simple preparation process; however, the competitive relationship between nucleation and seed growth may lead to the diversity of internal structures and the inhomogeneity of crystal size and shape [ 38 , 39 ]. Although electron beam lithography can precisely control the size and shape of particles, it is difficult to achieve practical applications due to its high cost and complex process [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one-step synthesis method and electron beam lithography have inherent shortcomings compared with the seed-mediated growth method. For example, the one-step synthesis method has a simple preparation process; however, the competitive relationship between nucleation and seed growth may lead to the diversity of internal structures and the inhomogeneity of crystal size and shape [ 38 , 39 ]. Although electron beam lithography can precisely control the size and shape of particles, it is difficult to achieve practical applications due to its high cost and complex process [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25][26][27] These carbonaceous matrixes are capable of not only increasing the active material conductivity and reducing the detrimental effect related to the sulfur volumetric expansion, but they are also able to confine or retain the polysulfides species thus leading to an improved cycling stability. [28][29][30] Furthermore, the associated synthesis of the composite active material typically involves solvothermal or melting processes for whom only one production step is needed. [31,32] With the aim of reducing the production costs and the synthesis steps, in this work we investigate the use of single-walled carbon nanohorns (SWCNHs) as possible sulfur host material through the implementation of a straightforward and sustainable evaporation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,8 Recent studies have evidenced that many carbonbased structures including graphene, [9][10][11][12] graphene oxide, 13 carbon nanotubes, 14 carbon fibers, 15 hollow Sinthika S. and Pushpa Selvi M. contributed equally to this work. carbon spheres, 16 and microporous carbon 17 have immense potential as cathode hosts for lithium-sulfur batteries. The inert nature of pristine graphene toward adsorbing LiPS; however, necessitates the incorporation of dopants like boron, nitrogen, sulfur, oxygen, and phosphorus in its lattice to enhance its anchoring capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%