2019
DOI: 10.1002/jccs.201900172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microporous 3D aluminum MOF doped into chitosan‐based mixed matrix membranes for ethanol/water separation

Abstract: An aluminum metal–organic framework (Al‐MOF), [Al(OH)(BPDC)] (DUT‐5; BPDC = Biphenyl‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate), was synthesized using solvothermal reactions. The high surface area and micropores (approximately 1.2 nm) of DUT‐5 were characterized using N2 gas sorption measurements. The thermal stability of DUT‐5 and its phase purity were also investigated. The different amounts of DUT‐5 (0.1, 0.15, and 0.2 wt%) were successfully incorporated into the chitosan (CS) polymer to prepare a mixed matrix membrane (MMM) for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These measurements were executed using a feed solution comprising 90 wt % ethanol at various temperatures (303, 313, 323, and 333 K). The pervaporation results for the UTSA‐280 membranes, based on mass flux and water permeability, are presented in Figure 3b and S6, alongside comparative data from other MOF‐based membranes [42–52] . Comprehensive details of these membranes, including thickness and water permeability, are summarized in Table S3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These measurements were executed using a feed solution comprising 90 wt % ethanol at various temperatures (303, 313, 323, and 333 K). The pervaporation results for the UTSA‐280 membranes, based on mass flux and water permeability, are presented in Figure 3b and S6, alongside comparative data from other MOF‐based membranes [42–52] . Comprehensive details of these membranes, including thickness and water permeability, are summarized in Table S3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pervaporation results for the UTSA-280 membranes, based on mass flux and water permeability, are presented in Figure 3b and S6, alongside comparative data from other MOF-based membranes. [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] Comprehensive details of these membranes, including thickness and water permeability, are summarized in Table S3. The UTSA-280 membrane exhibits an exceptional water-toethanol separation factor (33,201), thereby surpassing the performance of both pure MOF membranes and MOFbased mixed matrix membranes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DUT-5@CSDUT-5@CS membranes with 0.15wt% loading showed a significant increase in permeability and separation factor compared to the CS membrane. These promising results indicate the potential of using microporous Al-MOF in chitosan MMMs for bioethanol separation processes [ 86 ]. Fang et al developed a zirconium-based metal-organic framework (MOF) membrane for wastewater separation.…”
Section: Nanostructured Materials For Membrane Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some aluminum MOFs, including MIL-53 [ 91 , 92 ], MIL-96 [ 93 ], NH2-MIL-101 [ 94 , 95 ], CAU-21-ODB [ 96 ] and NH2-MIL-53 [ 94 , 97 ], are incorporated into polymer matrices. The successfully application of various aluminum MOFs such as DUT-5 [ 98 ], CAU-1 [ 99 ] and MIL-53 [ 100 ] in MMMs contributes into flux increment in the pervaporation study. However, these MOF-based membranes are only applied in ethyl acetate–water [ 101 ], dehydration of acetic acid and ethanol [ 102 ].…”
Section: Mixed Matrix Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%