2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08765-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microplastics in wastewater: microfiber emissions from common household laundry

Abstract: Microplastics are widely recognized as a category of emergent pollutants that can cause complex ecotoxicological effects. Synthetic fibers released during the washing of textiles are a relevant source of microplastics, which reach aquatic ecosystems from sewer discharges, even when there is retention in wastewater treatment plants. In this paper, we determined microfiber emissions from washing of textiles in a domestic environment, by collecting wastewater from washings of a mix of clothing from a household of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first report of this phenomenon, that of Browne et al (2011), 1900 microfibres/wash/garment was the estimated release; later studies have used more exact measurements, such as mg.kg À1 , microfibres.m-2 (see Table 1). The effects of variables such as type of textile, detergent, temperature and washing action have been determined, some of them using special small simulation machines, in which parameters can be specified and held constant (e.g., Hernandez et al, 2017;Carney Almroth et al, 2018), whilst others (e.g., Lant et al, 2020;Dalla Fontana et al, 2020;Galvão et al, 2020; K€ arkk€ ainen and Sillanp€ a€ a 2021) have employed domestic washers of various types. Such studies can give useful insights into the effects of changes in laundry procedures and could be useful in the development of a standard test method.…”
Section: Release Of Microfibres During Washing Of Textilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first report of this phenomenon, that of Browne et al (2011), 1900 microfibres/wash/garment was the estimated release; later studies have used more exact measurements, such as mg.kg À1 , microfibres.m-2 (see Table 1). The effects of variables such as type of textile, detergent, temperature and washing action have been determined, some of them using special small simulation machines, in which parameters can be specified and held constant (e.g., Hernandez et al, 2017;Carney Almroth et al, 2018), whilst others (e.g., Lant et al, 2020;Dalla Fontana et al, 2020;Galvão et al, 2020; K€ arkk€ ainen and Sillanp€ a€ a 2021) have employed domestic washers of various types. Such studies can give useful insights into the effects of changes in laundry procedures and could be useful in the development of a standard test method.…”
Section: Release Of Microfibres During Washing Of Textilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the polymer distribution from textiles on the Swedish market [30] was used. The number of particles was converted to mass by using average dimensions of polyester fibres (length 0.1-0.8 mm; diameter 0.011-0.026 mm) obtained from laundry studies [32,34,36,44] and the densities of the polymers.…”
Section: Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used red-pink polyester fibers, which also showed strong autofluorescence with red filter settings (excitation 511-551 nm, emission 573-613 nm), since they are easy to distinguish in color and shape from other natural or worn fibers that might occur as contaminants in the laboratory. For the present study, we filtered fibers through a < 300 μm sieve to resemble the fiber size class that is released during household washing, which can reach the environment as laundry effluent (93% of the released fibers were below 500 μm in length [14]).…”
Section: Environmental Relevance Of the Used Microplastic Fibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, accelerated blood flow velocities and heart rates, and slightly inhibited hatching rates, were observed in a first study conducted with microplastic fibers (polyethylene terephthalate (PET), 3-5 mm) and zebrafish embryos [13]. For the present study, we chose smaller microplastic fibers (< 0.3 mm) similar to the fiber size class produced during household washing [14,15], which enters the environment as laundry effluents [16]. Microplastic fibers < 300 μm slip through neuston nets commonly used for sampling fibers in environmental surveillance [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%