2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microplastics in Galway Bay: A comparison of sampling and separation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this clear bias towards low-density polymers, it is a method that has been used extensively since it was rst tested in 2004, predominantly due to its low cost and limited potential for harm. 11,44,48 In soils with purely inorganic content, both oil and ZnCl 2 had much higher recovery rates than NaCl and which extended across the different polymer types. Extraction with canola oil recovered the most small microplastics so is preferential for extractions from soils with high inorganic content, as environmental samples tend to be dominated by smaller microplastics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite this clear bias towards low-density polymers, it is a method that has been used extensively since it was rst tested in 2004, predominantly due to its low cost and limited potential for harm. 11,44,48 In soils with purely inorganic content, both oil and ZnCl 2 had much higher recovery rates than NaCl and which extended across the different polymer types. Extraction with canola oil recovered the most small microplastics so is preferential for extractions from soils with high inorganic content, as environmental samples tend to be dominated by smaller microplastics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We decided on such a methodology because it is possible to analyse the entire sample and there is less risk of losing the microplastics sought in the whole process. Density separation (Hidalgo--Ruz et al 2012, Wagner et al 2014, Dris et al 2015b, Bogusz & Oleszczuk 2016, Frère et al 2017, Graca et al 2017, Pagter et al 2018 was not performed because it is only recommended for light polymers (Rezania et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 10 g of oven-dried sediment was weighed and placed into a pre-cleaned glass jar. 105 mL of sodium tungstate dihydrate (Na2WO4.2H2O, 40 % w/v, density 1.4 g cm -3 ), as recommended by Frias et al (2018) and Pagter et al (2018), was added to each glass jar, the mixture was shaken for approximately 1 minute and the sediments were allowed to settle. From each sample jar, the overlying sodium tungstate dihydrate solution was removed using a pipette and filtered under vacuum onto glass microfiber paper (GF/C), Whatman 47 mm, pore size 1.2 µm, using a Buchner funnel and an Erlenmeyer flask.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%