2022
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.202200136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microplastics in agroecosystems: A review of effects on soil biota and key soil functions

Abstract: Contamination of soils in agroecosystems with microplastics (MPs) is of increasing concern. The contamination of the environment/farmland soils with MPs (1 µm to 5 mm sized particles) and nanoplastics (NPs; <1 µm sized particles) is causing numerous effects on ecological soil functions and human health. MPs enter the soil via several sources, either from intentional plastic use (e.g., plastic mulch, plastic greenhouses, plastic‐coated products) or indirectly from the input of sewage sludge, compost, or irrigat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 178 publications
(282 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smaller plastics have more adverse toxicological effects on larger organisms ( Wan et al, 2023 ), since microplastics may enter plant tissues through root pores or enter animal bodies through ingestion, tend to be more harmful to plants and soil animals than larger-sized plastics ( Li et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2022b , d ). Yet microbial responses to plastics are reflected at the level of the entire community ( Shafea et al, 2023 ), hence, this rule may not always be accurate when extrapolating to the effect of entire plastics to microbial communities ( Mammo et al, 2020 ; Wiedner and Polifka, 2020 ; Zhang S. L. et al, 2021 ). Taking into account all plastic residues, it appears that the effects of plastics on microbial parameters have a size threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller plastics have more adverse toxicological effects on larger organisms ( Wan et al, 2023 ), since microplastics may enter plant tissues through root pores or enter animal bodies through ingestion, tend to be more harmful to plants and soil animals than larger-sized plastics ( Li et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2022b , d ). Yet microbial responses to plastics are reflected at the level of the entire community ( Shafea et al, 2023 ), hence, this rule may not always be accurate when extrapolating to the effect of entire plastics to microbial communities ( Mammo et al, 2020 ; Wiedner and Polifka, 2020 ; Zhang S. L. et al, 2021 ). Taking into account all plastic residues, it appears that the effects of plastics on microbial parameters have a size threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro (nano) plastics also affect the delivery of ecosystem services to human populations and decrease agricultural productivity and fisheries yield, and affect the carbon sequestration capacity of ecosystems. 40 Micro (nano) plastics influence the carbon burial rates in marine sediments and ultimately affect the carbon sequestration capacity of ecosystems and alter the global carbon cycle. The intentional and unintentional input of these invisible plastic compounds into the environment may have a latent impact on global carbon stocks.…”
Section: Role Of Mnps On Ecosystem Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil physical properties mainly depend on the soil structure, formed by the pore space and the aggregation of soil particles due to emerging and binding elementary soil particles following a bottom-up process (Yudina and Kuzyakov 2023). MaP and MiP are likely to disrupt the soil pore interface during aggregation, influencing soil structure (Wang et al 2020, Shafea et al 2023b. For instance, MiPs and their various shapes modulate soil aggregates formation and organic matter decomposition, specifically fiber-shaped ones (Lehmann et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%