2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microplastic variability in subsurface water from the Arctic to Antarctica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interactions between river plumes and ambient sea are important for understanding land-ocean fluxes of fluvial water and river-borne dissolved and suspended matter. Structure and circulation at the plume border play an important role in transport of fine terrigenous sediments [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and floating matter, including river-borne marine litter and microplastic [14][15][16][17], fish larvae [18][19][20][21], etc. However, many processes at the plume-sea interface remain understudied, especially those with small spatial and temporal scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interactions between river plumes and ambient sea are important for understanding land-ocean fluxes of fluvial water and river-borne dissolved and suspended matter. Structure and circulation at the plume border play an important role in transport of fine terrigenous sediments [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and floating matter, including river-borne marine litter and microplastic [14][15][16][17], fish larvae [18][19][20][21], etc. However, many processes at the plume-sea interface remain understudied, especially those with small spatial and temporal scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Southern Ocean also probably receives plastic particles from lower latitudes through long-range marine and atmospheric transport, 140 their concentrations in open ocean waters appear to be very low. By sampling floating MPs (>100 μm) in subsurface waters from the Arctic to the Scotia Sea, Pakhomova et al 141 found significantly lower concentrations in the Southern Hemisphere than in the Northern. In surface and subsurface waters of the Weddell Sea gyre, Leistenschneider et al 142 measured MP concentrations of 0.01 ± 0.01 m −3 and 0.04 ± 0.1 m −3 , respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of plastic debris in the environment has been largely overlooked until recently. In the aquatic environment, the plastic wastes are susceptible to degradation at their accessible polymer surface into large quantities of microplastics (MPs, less than 5 mm in size) and nanoplastics (NPs, less than 1 μm in size) by a series of natural processes (cracking, fragmentation, oxidation, and chain scission), which makes it difficult to remove through water treatment system. In recent years, different types of MPs/NPs have been detected in freshwater systems, soil, air, and even in the areas of the Arctic and Antarctic. Besides, numerous reports highlight the presence of MP/NPs in daily life products such as cosmetics, drinking water, tea bags, milk, and foods. , Although not visible to the human eye, MPs/NPs are everywhere and pose an emerging concern for environmental organisms and human health. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%