2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-8440-1_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microplastic Pollution in Water and Their Removal in Various Wastewater Treatment Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…anthraquinone, and azo. Textile dyes are toxic, resistant, bioaccumulative, non-biodegradable, and carcinogenic and cause damaging consequences on the surroundings, even at low concentrations [7][8][9][10][11][12] . Classifying dyes based on the remaining particle charge after dissolution in an aqueous solution is standard.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…anthraquinone, and azo. Textile dyes are toxic, resistant, bioaccumulative, non-biodegradable, and carcinogenic and cause damaging consequences on the surroundings, even at low concentrations [7][8][9][10][11][12] . Classifying dyes based on the remaining particle charge after dissolution in an aqueous solution is standard.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other articles with 200 or more citations include Auta [65,66] discussing microbial MP degradation, as well as Edo [81], Conley [75] and Lv [119] discussing WWTPs. These results highlight the emphasis placed on interventions focused on the removal of MPs from wastewater (i.e., upstream interventions) globally, a trend evidenced by the large number of articles on wastewater treatment in this study (74.2%) and the voluminous number of articles on the removal of MPs from wastewater/sludge reviewed elsewhere [37,38,51].…”
Section: Scope Of Publications On Mp Interventions In Freshwater Systemsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Systems that employed a grease-skimming method during the preliminary treatment process seemed to have a large proportion of MPs removed from the treatment process, while filtration and membrane technologies seemed to be the most effective during the final stages of treatment [192]. While other reviews have shown that high efficacy rates for wastewater [51,196] and sludge [197] treatment plants are common, it should be said that very few of these treatment plants remove MPs with 100% efficacy, which implies that treatment plants are also a significant secondary source of MPs [194]. WWTPs have for some time now been recognized as perhaps one of the most significant sources of MP pollution globally [193,198,199].…”
Section: Levels Of Efficacy Across Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations