2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micropillar compression response of femtosecond laser-cut single crystal Cu and proton irradiated Cu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not explore the extent of damage caused by the technique, but rely on prior studies that have shown that the damage for metals is limited to a few micrometers below the surface. 7,8,19 It is not expected that, for the laser parameters used here, the damage should significantly exceed prior findings. For the 316L foil and AM91, a laseraffected region a few micrometers below the surface would comprise less than 5% of the response, well within the variation observed from measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do not explore the extent of damage caused by the technique, but rely on prior studies that have shown that the damage for metals is limited to a few micrometers below the surface. 7,8,19 It is not expected that, for the laser parameters used here, the damage should significantly exceed prior findings. For the 316L foil and AM91, a laseraffected region a few micrometers below the surface would comprise less than 5% of the response, well within the variation observed from measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Another study also looked at the effects of the femtosecond laser process on the production of micropillars. 8 A FIB was used to mill away 5 lm of the suspected HAZ after the laser processing, which created results similar to a purely FIB-based approach during compression testing. Since the mechanical test specimens were on the length scale of the HAZ, its effects could not be ignored and needed to be removed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardness and modulus measurements were computed using the Oliver-Pharr method, assuming a Poisson ratio of 0.3 [37]. For microtensile testing, small scale tensile specimens were fabricated using a femtosecond laser cutting system and procedure described in previous studies [38][39][40]. Tensile specimens were cut using an output pulse width of 350 fs, wavelength of 1053 nm, repetition rate of 20 kHz, and energy of 10 µJ focused through a 5x objective.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, most micromechanical testing studies rely on samples prepared using laser, ion beam, reactive ion etching etc. leading to a damaged surface layer that influences the deformation behavior [7,8]. Recent reviews highlight the few techniques that are available for manufacturing small-scale metal samples, including traditional FIB milling, template-based electrodeposition and a few recent additive micromanufacturing techniques [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%