2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:gege.0000013999.42592.56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micropile technique to control upward movement of lightweight structures over expansive soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the proposed method by Nusier and Alawneh. 2 The maximum measured percentage reduction in heave in this study was 87 . 2%.…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is consistent with the proposed method by Nusier and Alawneh. 2 The maximum measured percentage reduction in heave in this study was 87 . 2%.…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…2 For this purpose, the percentage reduction in heave for each test conducted in this study was calculated using equations (1) to (6) and the results are summarised in Table 4. A plot of measured against predicted percentage in heave is shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Comparison Of Measured and Predicted Rh (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The column acts as a floating-pile in which the soil-column interaction is only mechanically improved, but the heave remains during swelling (Muntohar, 2014, Diana et al, 2016. Upon clay wetting, vertical-swelling pressure was developed that had a tendency to push the foundation upward and therefore, retracted the micropiles from the surrounding sand (Nusier and Alawneh, 2004). Soundara and Robinson (2017) noted that the uplift pressure, due to the swelling pressure, was restrained by the interface of shear stress along the column of the micropile.…”
Section: Elapsed Time (Minutes)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include removing and replacing the expansive material [1], physical and chemical stabilization [2], drainage management such as vertical and horizontal barrier, and use of special foundation techniques [3]. Among several proposed methods to reduce the damage caused by expansive soil, vertical reinforcement such as pile [4], micro pile [5], granular pile anchor (GPA) [6], Geo-pile [7], cement columns [8] and lime columns [9], are structures that used to counteract the upward force caused on the foundation by the swelling soils. However, most of them are found to have a certain limitation in terms of technicality, effectiveness and may be very costly [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%