Microphysical particle properties derived from inversion algorithms developed in the framework of EARLINET

Abstract

Abstract. We present a summary on the current status of two inversion algorithms that are used in EARLINET (European Aerosol Research Lidar Network) for the inversion of data collected with EARLINET multiwavelength Raman lidars. These instruments measure backscatter coefficients at 355, 532, and 1064 nm, and extinction coefficients at 355 and 532 nm. Development of these two algorithms started in 2000 when EARLINET was founded. The algorithms are based on a manually controlled inversion of optical data which allows for detailed sensitivity studies. The algorithms allow us to derive particle effective radius as well as volume and surface area concentration with comparably high confidence. The retrieval of the real and imaginary parts of the complex refractive index still is a challenge in view of the accuracy required for these parameters in climate change studies in which light absorption needs to be known with high accuracy. It is an extreme challenge to retrieve the real part with an accuracy better than 0.05 and the imaginary part with accuracy better than 0.005-0.1 or ±50 %. Single-scattering albedo can be computed from the retrieved microphysical parameters and allows us to categorize aerosols into high-and low-absorbing aerosols.On the basis of a few exemplary simulations with synthetic optical data we discuss the current status of these manually operated algorithms, the potentially achievable accuracy of data products, and the goals for future work. One algorithm was used with the purpose of testing how well microphysical parameters can be derived if the real part of the complex refractive index is known to at least 0.05 or 0.1. The other algorithm was used to find out how well microphysical parameters can be derived if this constraint for the real part is not applied.The optical data used in our study cover a range of Ångström exponents and extinction-to-backscatter (lidar) ratios that are found from lidar measurements of various aerosol types. We also tested aerosol scenarios that are considered highly unlikely, e.g. the lidar ratios fall outside the commonly accepted range of values measured with Raman lidar, even though the underlying microphysical particle properties are not uncommon. The goal of this part of the study is to test the robustness of the algorithms towards their ability to identify aerosol types that have not been measured so far, but cannot be ruled out based on our current knowledge of aerosol physics.We computed the optical data from monomodal logarithmic particle size distributions, i.e. we explicitly excluded the more complicated case of bimodal particle size distributions which is a topic of ongoing research work. Another constraint is that we only considered particles of spherical shape in our simulations. We considered particle radii as large asPublished by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. D. Müller et al.: EARLINET inversion algorithms7-10 µm in our simulations where the Potsdam algorithm is limited to the lower value. We considered optical-d...

Microphysical characterization of long-range transported biomass burning particles from North America at three EARLINET stations

“…This method has been developed in the framework of EAR-LINET (Müller et al, 2016) and is based on explicitly solving the mathematical equations that relate the particle microphysical and optical properties by means of regularization techniques, an approach that is shared with Müller et al (1999) and Veselovskii et al (2002) inversion algorithms. That means that forward computations using tables containing microphysical versus optical properties are not carried out, having the advantage that particle size distribution shape is not assumed as input, but approximately calculated as output.…”

MOPSMAP v1.0: a versatile tool for the modeling of aerosol optical properties

“…It is required, for example, for closure experiments (consistency checks between different measurement methods involving an aerosol model, e.g., Wiegner et al, 2009;Gasteiger et al, 2011b;Müller et al, 2012;Bell et al, 2013;Ma et al, 2014;Zieger et al, 2014;Düsing et al, 2018), radiative transfer studies (e.g., Otto et al, 2009;Emde et al, 2010), the inversion of remote-sensing measurements (e.g., Dubovik et al, 2006;Gasteiger et al, 2011a;Müller et al, 2016), the inversion of in situ data (e.g., Weinzierl et al, 2009;Szymanski et al, 2009;Kassianov et al, 2014), aerosol layer visibility simulations (e.g., Weinzierl et al, 2012), dynamic aerosol transport models (e.g., Heinold et al, 2007;Balzarini et al, 2015), aerosol characterization (e.g., Gasteiger et al, 2017;Che et al, 2018;Zhuang et al, 2018), and solar energy (e.g., Polo et al, 2016;Kosmopoulos et al, 2017).…”

GARRLiC and LIRIC: strengths and limitations for the characterization of dust and marine particles along with their mixtures

“…Desert dust emissions and transport are described with the BSC-DREAM8b model (Nickovic et al, 2001;Pérez et al, 2006;Basart et al, 2012a). The BSC-DREAM8b model is embedded into the Eta/NCEP atmospheric model and solves the mass balance equation for dust, taking into account the different processes of the dust cycle (i.e.…”

“…Dubovik et al, 2006), whereas the lidar is capable of providing vertical profiles of the backscatter and extinction coefficients, along with vertical profiles of the particle microphysical properties, mainly for the fine mode (e.g. Müller et al, 2016). The combination of active and passive remote sensing has been tried so far mostly by using the sun-photometer-measured aerosol optical depth (AOD) as ancillary information for the lidar retrieval (e.g.…”