2020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microphthalmia, Linear Skin Defects, Callosal Agenesis, and Cleft Palate in a Patient with Deletion at Xp22.3p22.2

Abstract: The authors describe the clinical findings observed in a Brazilian girl that are suggestive of microphthalmia and linear skin defects (MLS) also known as MIDAS syndrome (OMIM #309801). She also presented with short stature, agenesis of corpus callosum, cleft palate, enamel defects, and genitourinary anomalies, which are rarely reported within the clinical spectrum of MLS. The 11,5 Mb deletion in Xp22.3p22.2 observed in the patient includes the entire HCCS gene (responsible for the MLS phenotype) and also encom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data available is mostly in the form of retrospective studies or case reports that are hugely biased due to maternal recall. 11 Another problem is the fact that the majority of such studies are focused on abnormalities and do not report sufficiently on pregnancy outcomes and risk factors. 7 Our study has a prospective case-control design, and we also collected data on risk factors to ensure a better comparison between cases and controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data available is mostly in the form of retrospective studies or case reports that are hugely biased due to maternal recall. 11 Another problem is the fact that the majority of such studies are focused on abnormalities and do not report sufficiently on pregnancy outcomes and risk factors. 7 Our study has a prospective case-control design, and we also collected data on risk factors to ensure a better comparison between cases and controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%