1993
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microphotocoagulation: selective effects of repetitive short laser pulses.

Abstract: Repetitive exposure to short laser pulses is shown to cause seective damage to absorbing structures (cells, organles, or enzymes) with pulse energies below the treshold energy for single-pulse damag. Detly adjacent strucures are spared in Wvo. Additvity of (presummbly nonphotochemical) (1,2). Depending on the exposure time, these effects may not be confined to the absorbing structures. During and after exposure, heat dissipates out of the absorbing volume, causing a substantial temperature increase in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
150
0
8

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
150
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Our 'high-density/low-intensity' SDM PRP technique, employing a large retinal laser spot size and low laser irradiance level, appeared effective in the treatment of severe non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. 19,[23][24][25][26][27] Like previous studies of PRP for PDR, overall visual acuity was unchanged. [28][29][30] However, the proportion of eyes with excellent visual acuity of 20/30 or better visual acuity increased from 39 to 48% during the course of the study, possibly due to avoidance of treatment complications that can reduce visual acuity postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Our 'high-density/low-intensity' SDM PRP technique, employing a large retinal laser spot size and low laser irradiance level, appeared effective in the treatment of severe non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. 19,[23][24][25][26][27] Like previous studies of PRP for PDR, overall visual acuity was unchanged. [28][29][30] However, the proportion of eyes with excellent visual acuity of 20/30 or better visual acuity increased from 39 to 48% during the course of the study, possibly due to avoidance of treatment complications that can reduce visual acuity postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…By irradiating the fundus with a train of microsecond laser pulses it is possible to achieve high peak temperatures solely around the RPEmelanosomes leading to RPE damage probably without effects on photoreceptors due to the heat conduction [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the multiple-pulse exposures, the calculated temperatures from the individual pulses were summed at the end of the pulse sequence. The Vyas solution was chosen over the Grossweiner et al 39 or the Roider et al 26 solutions, as it describes the temperature in both the depth and radial directions with time:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,20,24 For those modeling the temperature from laser pulse irradiation, the energy deposition is assumed to be an instantaneous impulse confined within the volume of deposition. [25][26][27][28][29] The conditions required for this assumption to be valid depend on the optical penetration in the tissue and the rate of heat flow or thermal diffusivity of the tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%