2017
DOI: 10.1121/1.4982694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microphone array geometry optimization for traffic noise analysis

Abstract: This paper outlines an approach for obtaining microphone array geometry for use in traffic noise analysis. The designed array has a smaller number of microphones compared to existing solutions, thereby reducing the cost of system realization. The array geometry is irregular, consists of 24 microphones, and was obtained by an optimization procedure that minimizes beampatterns sidelobes. Microphone position optimization was performed in the frequency band from 300 Hz to 2000 Hz, defined by traffic noise characte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One fundamental issue needs to be overcome: the limited amount of microphones and speakers in a smartphone. Acoustic imaging usually uses the speaker and microphone array as the transmitter and receiver [22]. However, the number of microphones and speakers in a smartphone is usually less than five.…”
Section: Theory Of Smartphone-based Acoustic Imaging Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One fundamental issue needs to be overcome: the limited amount of microphones and speakers in a smartphone. Acoustic imaging usually uses the speaker and microphone array as the transmitter and receiver [22]. However, the number of microphones and speakers in a smartphone is usually less than five.…”
Section: Theory Of Smartphone-based Acoustic Imaging Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have addressed the optimization of microphone array geometry. In the case of frequency-domain beamforming using planar microphone arrays, noise source map metrics such as the Main Lobe Width (MLW) or the Maximum Side lobe Level (MSL) can be optimized [16,17]. Planar spiral shaped arrays are a common tradeoff [18,19,20] because they allow for reducing side lobes amplitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colorbar is in dB. (Color online)function[16,17]. Reducing the MLW may affect the MSL and conversely.A multi-objective optimization can be used to tackle this problem at the expense of a more complex computation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kodrasi et al [30] adopted different heuristic optimization approaches and an exhaustive search approach to optimize the microphone positions for an arbitrary planar array based on the beamforming method, and Kodrasi’s methods found near-optimal configurations. Recently, Yan and Ma [31], Sarradj [32], Bjelić et al [33], Teng and Lv [34], and Le Courtois et al [35] also proposed new methods for planar array optimization based on the beamforming method, and compared the array performance under different localization scenarios. In the optimization procedure, the main-lobe width and side-lobe level are generally selected as the optimization objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these array optimization methods are mainly based on the beamforming and acoustic holography methods. The optimization procedure is also usually based on existing array structures, such as cross array [38], circle array [31], spiral array [32], irregular planar array [33,34], spherical array [38], and so on. As such, certain constraints for the array structure have been introduced to the optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%