2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2005.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microperforated insertion units: An alternative strategy to design microperforated panels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the MPP is made from a panel, it provides several advantages, such as being non-fibrous, non-abrasive, and non-polluting. Several works have been conducted concerning the improvement of sound absorption performance of the MPP, e.g., by arranging it to be a double-leaf (Sakagami et al, 2006), by increasing its thickness (Pfretzner and Cobo, 2006), and by modifying its hole geometry (Sakagami et al, 2008). This paper proposes the insertion of an MPP within a double-panel partition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the MPP is made from a panel, it provides several advantages, such as being non-fibrous, non-abrasive, and non-polluting. Several works have been conducted concerning the improvement of sound absorption performance of the MPP, e.g., by arranging it to be a double-leaf (Sakagami et al, 2006), by increasing its thickness (Pfretzner and Cobo, 2006), and by modifying its hole geometry (Sakagami et al, 2008). This paper proposes the insertion of an MPP within a double-panel partition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since for optimal absorption the perforation diameter should be less than 1 mm, the resulting low thickness of the panel would constrain its mechanical implementation in such a two-layer absorber configuration. Pfretzschner et al (2006) proposed an alternative methodology to construct more structurally robust MPPs, combining a thick panel with large perforations with a thinner one highly perforated. The passive absorption of such an extended absorber has already been measured, at normal incidence (Pfretzschner et al, 2006), at low angles of incidence in a free field (Cobo et al, 2006a), and in a reverberation room (Cobo et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Hybrid Passive-active Absorber In Anechoic Roommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pfretzschner et al (2006) proposed an alternative methodology to construct more structurally robust MPPs, combining a thick panel with large perforations with a thinner one highly perforated. The passive absorption of such an extended absorber has already been measured, at normal incidence (Pfretzschner et al, 2006), at low angles of incidence in a free field (Cobo et al, 2006a), and in a reverberation room (Cobo et al, 2006b). The current research is concerned with the design of the active absorber as well as the hybrid passive-active absorption measurements.…”
Section: Hybrid Passive-active Absorber In Anechoic Roommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with that, some studies have been done by modifying the form of pores in order to improve the performance e.g. tapered holes [9,10] for micro-perforated insertion units (MIU) [11]. Even though that can deal with the thicker panel effect on MPP but it still poses a difficulty from the practical point of view e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%