2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microparticles in Contact with Cells: From Carriers to Multifunctional Tissue Modulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
78
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(144 reference statements)
1
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microparticles, i.e., structures ranging from 1 to 1000 µm, have for long been the platform of choice for various biomedical applications, with numerous reports exploring microcarrier formulations for focal delivery and controlled release of therapeutics, as injectable tissue‐defect fillers, as biosensing tools, or as cell‐expansion systems in static/dynamic in vitro cultures …”
Section: Cell–biomaterials Assembliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microparticles, i.e., structures ranging from 1 to 1000 µm, have for long been the platform of choice for various biomedical applications, with numerous reports exploring microcarrier formulations for focal delivery and controlled release of therapeutics, as injectable tissue‐defect fillers, as biosensing tools, or as cell‐expansion systems in static/dynamic in vitro cultures …”
Section: Cell–biomaterials Assembliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technological progress, combined with particles physicochemical versatility, have provided the foundation for also exploring microparticles as injectable cell‐encapsulating platforms and for in vitro disease modeling . More recent endeavors have focused on exploring microparticles as building blocks for modular bottom‐up tissue engineering by taking advantage of their role as orchestrators of cellular aggregation and of their bioinstructive cues for 3D microtissues maturation . We will focus on cell–particle surface interactions at the material–bio interface rather than cell encapsulation which will be further discussed in hydrogel‐based platforms.…”
Section: Cell–biomaterials Assembliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microspheres, as solid scaffolds, usually possess high compression moduli and large surface areas, which are favorable for cell adhesion and spreading. Moreover, a well-fabricated porous structure may allow sufficient cell migration and maximum cell-cell interactions [45]. Microgels are usually used as microcarriers through cell-encapsulation strategies.…”
Section: Advantages Limitations and Prospectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the highly hydrophilic microenvironments may also constrain the suspended cells to a round shape, which decreases the cellular activity and function. Moreover, the surrounding hydrogel matrix may impede cell spread and migration, resulting in fewer cell interactions [45]. Based on these features, microspheres are relatively more widely applied for purpose of large-scale cell expansion, while microgels are more suitable as injectable platforms for cell delivery and therapy.…”
Section: Advantages Limitations and Prospectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation