2019
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micronutrient intakes of lactating mothers and their association with breast milk concentrations and micronutrient adequacy of exclusively breastfed Indonesian infants

Abstract: Background Breast milk is the sole source of nutrition for exclusively breastfed infants in the first 6 mo of life, yet few studies have measured micronutrient concentrations in breast milk in light of maternal diet and subsequent infant micronutrient intakes. Objectives We evaluated the adequacy of micronutrient intakes of exclusively breastfed Indonesian infants by measuring milk volume and micronutrient concentrations and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
83
9
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
14
83
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of human milk consumption by term infants from approximately 20 days to 6 months PNA was consistent with published analyses that also examined WHMI (Figure ). Linear regression models by Arcus‐Arth et al () and Daniels et al () appeared to predict similar rates of WHMI as the nonlinear regression model of this review until 6 months of age. Data past 6 months of age were not comparable due to the inclusion of only EBF infants >6 months of age in this review, whereas Arcus‐Arth et al () included PBF infants >6 months of age and Daniels et al () modelled intake from a cross‐sectional study of 113 infants with data only until 5–6 months of age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The rate of human milk consumption by term infants from approximately 20 days to 6 months PNA was consistent with published analyses that also examined WHMI (Figure ). Linear regression models by Arcus‐Arth et al () and Daniels et al () appeared to predict similar rates of WHMI as the nonlinear regression model of this review until 6 months of age. Data past 6 months of age were not comparable due to the inclusion of only EBF infants >6 months of age in this review, whereas Arcus‐Arth et al () included PBF infants >6 months of age and Daniels et al () modelled intake from a cross‐sectional study of 113 infants with data only until 5–6 months of age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Linear regression models by Arcus‐Arth et al () and Daniels et al () appeared to predict similar rates of WHMI as the nonlinear regression model of this review until 6 months of age. Data past 6 months of age were not comparable due to the inclusion of only EBF infants >6 months of age in this review, whereas Arcus‐Arth et al () included PBF infants >6 months of age and Daniels et al () modelled intake from a cross‐sectional study of 113 infants with data only until 5–6 months of age. As a strength of this review, WHMI of EBF term infants were captured by the regression model for >6 months of age and will therefore provide conservative values for subsequent risk assessments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, we did not have information on the concentrations of other micronutrients in breast milk [12], maternal antibodies, the frequency of breastfeeding and gut microbiota [13] which may also influence the incidence of diarrhea and respiratory infections. Other residual confounders that should be investigated in future studies of micronutrient concentration and adequacy in breast milk include breast milk volume, infant micronutrient intake from breast milk, infant weight, infant age, parity, and micronutrient status of the mothers during pregnancy [14]. Further, no information was available on diarrhea severity, which may modify its relationship to B12 status [15].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%