2022
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.851134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microneedle-Based Device for Biological Analysis

Abstract: The collection and analysis of biological samples are an effective means of disease diagnosis and treatment. Blood sampling is a traditional approach in biological analysis. However, the blood sampling approach inevitably relies on invasive techniques and is usually performed by a professional. The microneedle (MN)-based devices have gained increasing attention due to their noninvasive manner compared to the traditional blood-based analysis method. In the present review, we introduce the materials for fabricat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7] At present, the implementation of microneedle arrays as interface materials for electrochemical sensing has predominately relied on metallic microneedles (e.g., stainless steel), or metalized coatings consisting of thin metal films (predominately gold and platinum), required to obtain the conductive layer for signal transduction. [10] Although incorporating such materials remain the gold standard due to their well-understood properties, such as chemical stability and electrical consistency, they also lack mechanical flexibility, ease of processibility, and often present poor biocompatibility, in conjunction with loss of functionality over time. [11] Intrinsically conducting polymers such as PPy and PEDOT:PSS can prove impressive alternatives for the development of conductive microneedle surfaces due to their excellent electrical properties even under mechanical stress.…”
Section: Conductive Polymeric Microneedle (Mn) Arrays As Biointerface...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] At present, the implementation of microneedle arrays as interface materials for electrochemical sensing has predominately relied on metallic microneedles (e.g., stainless steel), or metalized coatings consisting of thin metal films (predominately gold and platinum), required to obtain the conductive layer for signal transduction. [10] Although incorporating such materials remain the gold standard due to their well-understood properties, such as chemical stability and electrical consistency, they also lack mechanical flexibility, ease of processibility, and often present poor biocompatibility, in conjunction with loss of functionality over time. [11] Intrinsically conducting polymers such as PPy and PEDOT:PSS can prove impressive alternatives for the development of conductive microneedle surfaces due to their excellent electrical properties even under mechanical stress.…”
Section: Conductive Polymeric Microneedle (Mn) Arrays As Biointerface...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A noninvasive myoelectrical control scheme mainly consists of sEMG acquisition [29][30][31][32] and sEMG-based control strategy (figures 1(d) and (e)). Amputees' motion intentions are identified to control hand prostheses voluntarily.…”
Section: Myoelectrical Control Of Bionic Handmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 μL) to provide reliable measurements . Tremendous advances have been achieved in both the design and targets of MN (bio)­sensors, with glucose sensors at the forefront of the list. , Yet, there are several challenges to be addressed, including new analytes, proper calibration, reliable validation of on-body data, and the managing of ethical permits, which results in only few investigations reaching true in vivo measurements. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Tremendous advances have been achieved in both the design and targets of MN (bio)sensors, with glucose sensors at the forefront of the list. 5,6 Yet, there are several challenges to be addressed, including new analytes, proper calibration, reliable validation of on-body data, and the managing of ethical permits, which results in only few investigations reaching true in vivo measurements. 7−9 Amino acids (AAs) are potential targets of MN biosensors, as the clinical interest in their detection has increased in recent years owing to new discoveris.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%