1969
DOI: 10.1128/aem.17.1.88-92.1969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromethod for Assaying Serum Levels of Erythromycin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibiotic assay for erythromycin.-We used a microbiological assay modified after Bell et al (1969) and Evelyn et al (1986) to determine the concentrations of erythromycin in samples of tissue, plasma, and feed. This method enabled the concentration of antibiotic to be estimated by comparison with the diameters of inhibition zones formed in colonies of an erythromycin-sensitive bacterium by known concentrations of erythromycin in standards.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibiotic assay for erythromycin.-We used a microbiological assay modified after Bell et al (1969) and Evelyn et al (1986) to determine the concentrations of erythromycin in samples of tissue, plasma, and feed. This method enabled the concentration of antibiotic to be estimated by comparison with the diameters of inhibition zones formed in colonies of an erythromycin-sensitive bacterium by known concentrations of erythromycin in standards.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision attained with the use of disposable micropipets appeared to be less dependent upon the technical expertise of the operator than did methods involving larger pipets, capillary action, or dipping the discs into serum. The precision compares favorably with the precision of a micromethod carried out on small petri dishes, as recently described for the assay of colicins 7and for the assay of serum levels of erythromycin (1).…”
Section: Reslmtsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…1) is widely used as a macrolide antibiotic. Previous pharmacokinetic data published on this antibiotic have been based predominantly on a microbiological method (Bell et al, 1969). Several high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods with UV (Yamashita et al, 1993;Cachet et al, 1992;Stubbs et al, 1985), electrochemical detection (Janecek et al, 1993;Laakso et al, 1990;Grgurinovich and Matthews, 1988;Stubbs and Kanfer, 1988;Nilsson et al, 1987;Croteau et al, 1987;Chen and Chiou, 1983), fluorimetric detection (Tod et al, 1992;Tsuji, 1978) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) have been developed for the determination of EA in biological fluids (Li et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%