2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.8.014031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micrometer-Scale Magnetic-Resonance-Coupled Radio-Frequency Identification and Transceivers for Wireless Sensors in Cells

Abstract: We report the design, analysis and characterization of a three-inductor radio-frequency identification (RFID) and transceiver (TRX) system for potential applications in individual cell tracking and monitoring. The RFID diameter is 22 µm and can be naturally internalized by living cells. Using magnetic resonant coupling, the system shows resonance shifts when the RFID is present and also when the RFID loading capacitance changes. It operates at 60 GHz with a high signal magnitude up to −50 dB and a sensitivity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We choose optical input-output (I/O) because the relevant optoelectronic components can readily be miniaturized to the microscale and read out remotely using far-field, free-space coupling. In contrast, devices based (50 μm) 2 on RF at this size (17)(18)(19)(20) are fundamentally limited to near-field coupling, requiring readers and power sources to be within less than a millimeter of the sensors (12). Ultrasound is also emerging as a promising approach, but to date the apparatus is specialized and the sensors have not been miniaturized to truly microscopic scales (12,13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose optical input-output (I/O) because the relevant optoelectronic components can readily be miniaturized to the microscale and read out remotely using far-field, free-space coupling. In contrast, devices based (50 μm) 2 on RF at this size (17)(18)(19)(20) are fundamentally limited to near-field coupling, requiring readers and power sources to be within less than a millimeter of the sensors (12). Ultrasound is also emerging as a promising approach, but to date the apparatus is specialized and the sensors have not been miniaturized to truly microscopic scales (12,13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows a rendering in which individual cells are tagged with the RFID tags. We 27 modeled, designed, and fabricated an aseptic version of this miniature wireless system using Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) 40 nm complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) technology 28 . The dimensions and design constraints are contingent on the size-dependent internalization rates of the RFIDs by cell, as previously revealed by Chen 29 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with traditional bar codes, one of the biggest advantages is that the RFID tags can be embedded in objects that are being tracked, while not necessarily distributed on the surface of the objects. There have been many RFID-based sensors that can sense variable environmental parameters [ 11 , 12 ], including pipeline integrity and humidity, even on individual cell tracking and monitoring [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%