2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.139942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromechanical testing of unirradiated and helium ion irradiated SA508 reactor pressure vessel steels: Nanoindentation vs in-situ microtensile testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 26 ] Three repetitions on each sample allowed obtaining statistically representative values from such a heterogeneous material. More details on the nanoindentation test are discussed in previous works, [ 27–30 ] where the authors explain how it is possible to calculate the indentation hardness (HI, GPa) and indentation elastic modulus ( E IT, GPa). A representative optical image of the indentation and corresponding load–displacement curves are reported in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 26 ] Three repetitions on each sample allowed obtaining statistically representative values from such a heterogeneous material. More details on the nanoindentation test are discussed in previous works, [ 27–30 ] where the authors explain how it is possible to calculate the indentation hardness (HI, GPa) and indentation elastic modulus ( E IT, GPa). A representative optical image of the indentation and corresponding load–displacement curves are reported in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HIP steel investigated was of alloy type SA508 Grade 3 Class 1, produced as part of an Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) development programme and was provided by Rolls-Royce. It is the same steel investigated by Gasparrini et al [26] The resulting alloy composition (of the consolidated material), as determined by chemical analysis methods at Rolls-Royce, is given in Table 1, in addition to the composition of a comparative forged alloy of the same grade used in this project. A result of the HIP process is a steel microstructure different to that produced via conventional forging methods.…”
Section: Materials and Irradiation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous micromechanical testing on the same HIP steel showed that the bainite and ferrite phases had a similar level of hardening when irradiated with He 2+ ions to 0.6dpa. The nanohardness, measured in continuous stiffness measurement mode, of the unirradiated bainite and ferrite phases, was 2.89 ± 0.19GPa and 2.69 ± 0.24GPa respectively, whilst the nanohardness of He 2+ ion irradiated bainite and ferrite was 6.08 ± 0.34GPa and 6.03 ± 0.17GPa respectively [26]. The bainite phase hardened by 3.19 ± 0.39GPa while the ferrite phase hardened by 3.34 ± 0.29GPa as it started as the softer phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, only limited investigations into the irradiation response of PM-HIP alloys had been performed. In studies by Carter et al and Gasparrini et al respectively, low-carbon steel SA508 was HIP processed then irradiated with neutrons (155 • C, 0.1 dpa) or He ions (room temperature, 0.6 dpa) [14,15]. Carter and coworkers observed irradiation hardening associated with uniform Ni-Mn-S-P clustering in both the bainite and ferrite phases, whereas Gasparrini and coworkers attributed considerable hardening to bubble/void formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%