Micromechanical modeling of anisotropic behavior of oriented semicrystalline polymers

Abstract

Some manufacturing processes of polymeric materials, such as injection molding or film blowing, cause the final product to be highly anisotropic. In this study, the mechanical behavior of drawn polyethylene (PE) tapes is investigated via micromechanical modeling. An elasto‐viscoplastic micromechanical model, developed within the framework of the so‐called composite inclusion model, is presented to capture the anisotropic behavior of oriented semicrystalline PE. Two different phases, namely amorphous and crystalline (both described by elasto‐viscoplastic constitutive models), are considered at the microstructural level. The initial oriented crystallographic structure of the drawn tapes is taken into account. It was previously shown by Sedighiamiri et al. (Comp. Mater. Sci. 2014, 82, 415) that by only considering the oriented crystallographic structure, it is not possible to capture the macroscopic anisotropic behavior of drawn tapes. The main contribution of this study is the development of an anisotropic model for the amorphous phase within the micromechanical framework. An Eindhoven glassy polymer (EGP)‐based model including different sources of anisotropy, namely anisotropic elasticity, internal stress in the elastic network and anisotropic viscoplasticity, is developed for the amorphous phase and incorporated into the micromechanical model. Comparisons against experimental results reveal remarkable improvements of the model predictions (compared to micromechanical model predictions including isotropic amorphous domains) and thus the significance of the amorphous phase anisotropy on the overall behavior of drawn PE tapes. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2019, 57, 378–391

The mechanical behavior of polylactic acid (PLA) films: fabrication, experiments and modelling

“…Remark 2 It should be emphasized that if a wider range of strain rates was used, it was probably needed to use two viscoplastic flow processes in the constitutive model (see, e.g. Mirkhalaf et al 2019). This is due to the fact that experimental results on tensile yield behavior of isotropic polymers show that two relaxation processes contribute to the viscoplastic flow (see, e.g.…”

A Hierarchical Coupled Multi-Scale Model for Short Fiber Composites

“…This modeling approach could be extended to use an elasto-viscoplastic model for a polymeric matrix material (e.g. [13,14,15]). In the second homogenization step, the homogenized properties of the composite are obtained using the UC homogenized properties and taking into account the orientation distribution of the fibers in the composite via orientation averaging.…”

Crystallinity and chain stem length dependence of yield kinetics in polyethylene

“…[14][15][16] Modeling of the plastic behavior of polyethylene as a semicrystalline composite aggregate has more recently been undertaken, which allows for the accounting of the effects (in principle) of crystallinity, crystal thickness, and crystal orientation distributions. [17][18][19][20][21] In these works, the simultaneous activity of the various slip systems in the crystal phase depends on the relative critical resolved shear stresses for each system. These large-strain micromechanical models of polyethylene deformation have been successful in predicting the evolution of the microstructure with deformation and the attendant development of mechanical anisotropy and crystalline texture.…”

“…Modeling of the plastic behavior of polyethylene as a semicrystalline composite aggregate has more recently been undertaken, which allows for the accounting of the effects (in principle) of crystallinity, crystal thickness, and crystal orientation distributions 17–21 . In these works, the simultaneous activity of the various slip systems in the crystal phase depends on the relative critical resolved shear stresses for each system.…”