2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromechanical analysis of the effective properties of lattice structures in additive manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison purposes, the analytical model described by Souza et al [11] is exemplarily used. It determines the relationship between aspect ratio, strut diameter, and mechanical properties for a given cellular structure, whereby the cell struts are considered as Timoshenko beams [41] in order to cover high to low aspect ratios.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For comparison purposes, the analytical model described by Souza et al [11] is exemplarily used. It determines the relationship between aspect ratio, strut diameter, and mechanical properties for a given cellular structure, whereby the cell struts are considered as Timoshenko beams [41] in order to cover high to low aspect ratios.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of brevity, the way the model works is shortly summed up. Please refer to the corresponding publication for more details [11]. The analytical model consists of a strain energy based homogenization scheme of the representative volume element (RVE) in the linear elastic domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their results showed that the relative density and topology of unit cell considerably affect the mechanical behavior of structures. Souza et al 15 proposed a closed-form analytical solution to determine effective properties of additively manufactured microstructures. A comparison between experimental results and proposed analytical solution showed excellent agreement for relative densities lower than 40%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%