2002
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2002)128:8(889)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromechanical Analysis of Anisotropic Damage in Brittle Materials

Abstract: A general three-dimensional micromechanical approach to modeling anisotropic damage of brittle materials such as concrete, rocks, or certain ceramics is presented. Damage is analyzed as a direct consequence of microcracks growth. Following a rigorous scale change methodology, the macroscopic free energy of the microcracked medium is built considering either open and closed microcracks. Moreover, the microcracks opening/closure criterion as well as the moduli recovery conditions (unilateral effects) are address… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
111
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies (e.g. [24]) have shown that no significant difference in accuracy is obtained if 33 crack families are used rather than 21. The set of 21 families of microcracks are retained in the present work.…”
Section: Damage Modeling Accounting For Unilateral Effects In Presencmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies (e.g. [24]) have shown that no significant difference in accuracy is obtained if 33 crack families are used rather than 21. The set of 21 families of microcracks are retained in the present work.…”
Section: Damage Modeling Accounting For Unilateral Effects In Presencmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, the implementation of the anisotropic damage model requires an orientational average (integration) over the surface of unit sphere. This numerical implementation procedure is inspired from studies on microplane models [3] (see also [24] in the context of micromechanical damage models).…”
Section: Damage Modeling Accounting For Unilateral Effects In Presencmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The formulae of the "Appendix" are based on so-called Mori-Tanaka homogenization schemes [23], where the mechanical interactions between inhomogeneities (here viscous interfaces) in a homogeneous matrix are considered not up to complete detail, but rather in an average sense, see, e.g., [1,2,24] for more detailed discussions: each interface (or more generally, each inhomogeneity) is formally embedded in a fictitious matrix undergoing the mean strains of the actual material matrix, these strains being different from the macroscopic strains acting on the entire RVE; the matrix and inhomogeneity strains are enforced to fulfill the strain average rule for the entire RVE. The Mori-Tanaka scheme has been repeatedly used for modeling the behavior of cracked materials [25][26][27]. In particular, it has been shown that in the case of sharp cracks (exhibiting the same morphology as the interfaces), the aforementioned average consideration of inhomogeneity interaction leads to remarkably precise results for the overall homogenized stiffness properties, when compared to solutions accounting for fully explicit interactions, as has been shown by Kachanov et al [25].…”
Section: State Equations For Uniform Strain Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(32) motivates us to assume that the damage dissipation also evolves independently on each orientation, thus identifying U X as the thermodynamic force conjugate to d X . It should be noted that this basic assumption overlaps with certain concepts in which multiple-plane representations of inelasticity are derived (SEAMAN and DEIN, 1983;BAZˇANT and GAMBAROVA, 1984;JU and LEE, 1991a,b;ESPINOSA and BRAR, 1995;PENSE´E et al, 2002).…”
Section: Dissipation and Internal State Variablesmentioning
confidence: 89%