2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4918638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromagnetics on high-performance workstation and mobile computational platforms

Abstract: The feasibility of using high-performance desktop and embedded mobile computational platforms is presented, including multi-core Intel central processing unit, Nvidia desktop graphics processing units, and Nvidia Jetson TK1 Platform. FastMag finite element method-based micromagnetic simulator is used as a testbed, showing high efficiency on all the platforms. Optimization aspects of improving the performance of the mobile systems are discussed. The high performance, low cost, low power consumption, and rapid p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The derivative and function evaluations in dynamical and static micromagnetic computations are very expensive, mostly due to the nonlocal stray field component. However, the use of a stray field algorithm that scales optimally or quasi-optimially with problem size such as the algebraic multigrid method [46,42,13], the fast multipole method [50,4,33] and hierarchical matrices [36], fast Fourier transform based methods (FFT) [50,16,49] or non-uniform FFT algorithms [29,15,20] is not sufficient to obtain a micromagnetic solver that scales linearly with problem size. Owing to the exchange interactions the micromagnetic equations can be considered as stiff [9] and the number of time steps in a dynamical solver or the number of iterations in a static solver increase with increasing problem size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derivative and function evaluations in dynamical and static micromagnetic computations are very expensive, mostly due to the nonlocal stray field component. However, the use of a stray field algorithm that scales optimally or quasi-optimially with problem size such as the algebraic multigrid method [46,42,13], the fast multipole method [50,4,33] and hierarchical matrices [36], fast Fourier transform based methods (FFT) [50,16,49] or non-uniform FFT algorithms [29,15,20] is not sufficient to obtain a micromagnetic solver that scales linearly with problem size. Owing to the exchange interactions the micromagnetic equations can be considered as stiff [9] and the number of time steps in a dynamical solver or the number of iterations in a static solver increase with increasing problem size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, images sensed by spaceborne Earth-observation missions are not on-board processed. The main rationale behind this is the limited on-board power capacity that forces the use of low-power devices, which are normally not as highly performing as their commercial counterparts [3][4][5][6][7][8]. In this regard, images are subsequently downloaded to the Earth surface where they are off-line processed on high-performance computing systems based on Central Processing Units (CPUs), Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), or heterogeneous architectures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the emergence of computing boards that embed low energy consumption GPUs has made more attractive their use, especially in on-board applications carried out by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) [9,17,18]. Nevertheless, these low-power GPUs (LPGPUs) are not as high performing as the same generation desktop GPUs [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%