2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.06.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromagnetic simulation of exploratory magnetic logic device with missing corner defect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Niemier et al proposed a dual input AND/OR logic gate using a nanomagnet with slanted edge, increasing the efficiency and accuracy of NML [4]. However, the nanomagnets of this structure are asymmetrical in shape and have three disadvantages: 1) This type of nanomagnet requires a larger size, thus increasing the NML space and introducing clock errors of the C-shape and eddy current that are easily occur in large-sized nanomagnets [5][6][7]. 2) Complex calculations caused by the irregular shape are inevitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niemier et al proposed a dual input AND/OR logic gate using a nanomagnet with slanted edge, increasing the efficiency and accuracy of NML [4]. However, the nanomagnets of this structure are asymmetrical in shape and have three disadvantages: 1) This type of nanomagnet requires a larger size, thus increasing the NML space and introducing clock errors of the C-shape and eddy current that are easily occur in large-sized nanomagnets [5][6][7]. 2) Complex calculations caused by the irregular shape are inevitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, intense research effort is focused on exploring alternative emerging devices beyond CMOS to perform a binary logical function [1] and special computational operation [2] . One promising device technology type among them is nanomagnetics, such as magnetic quantum cellular automata (MQCA, also called nanomagnet logic, NML) [3][4][5] , domain wall (DW) [6] , magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) [7] , and spin transfer torque (STT) [8] , etc. The main reason for the interest in these nanomagnetic switches is their nonvolatility and comparably low power consumption in combination with the ability to perform logic and storage in one single element [9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the x-y direction defines the in-plane dimension, while the z axis direction depicts the out-of-plane dimension (thickness). The in-plane magnetizations along the y axis (easy axis) are used to encode binary logic states '1' (up) and '0' (down), respectively; while along the x axis (hard axis) denote 'null' logic [4] (see Fig. 1(b)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, (ℎ − 𝑙) also represents the missing edge amplitude of the trapezoid-shaped magnet. [15] An identical ℎ × 𝑤 parameter is used for the regular shape nanomagnet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%