Abstract:A micromachined ultrasonic droplet generator is developed and demonstrated for drop-on-demand fluid atomization. The droplet generator comprises a bulk ceramic piezoelectric transducer for ultrasound generation, a reservoir for the ejection fluid, and a silicon micromachined liquid horn structure as the nozzle. The nozzles are formed using a simple batch microfabrication process that involves wet etching of (100) silicon in potassium hydroxide solution. Device operation is demonstrated by droplet ejection of w… Show more
“…Continued efforts to model and simulate droplet and ion transport in the air amplifier will enable improved designs and device implementation to further enhance ion transmission efficiency and lower limits of detection. The improvements shown in this work for standard ESI-MS should be also of great value to other emerging ambient ionization techniques such as DESI [21,22], MALDESI [23,24], and AMUSE [25,26].…”
“…Continued efforts to model and simulate droplet and ion transport in the air amplifier will enable improved designs and device implementation to further enhance ion transmission efficiency and lower limits of detection. The improvements shown in this work for standard ESI-MS should be also of great value to other emerging ambient ionization techniques such as DESI [21,22], MALDESI [23,24], and AMUSE [25,26].…”
“…[15][16][17] One of the vibrators, an ultrasonic, can generate typical size of droplets. 18,19 However, the task of rapidly generating droplets in cell structures is not easy.…”
We present a novel method of generating and retrieving droplets stored in microfluidic grooves or cavity structures. First we designed and fabricated polydimethylsiloxane microchannels with grooves on the walls and then produced a two-phase flow of oil and aqueous phases to form aqueous phase droplets in an oil state. We propose the following three mechanisms of droplet generation: the contact line on the groove wall continues moving along the wall and descends to the bottom of the cavity, confining the aqueous phase in the cavity; once the interface between the oil and aqueous phases moves into the cavity, the interface contacts the top of the neighboring groove; and a spherical droplet forms at the corner in the cavity due to surface tension. The viscosity of the oil phase and the surface tension of the interface determine whether a droplet can be generated. Then, we could adjust the velocity of the interface and the aspect ratio of the cavity to achieve the optimal conditions for generating the single droplet. We observed that the largest droplet is stably generated without a daughter droplet at typical values of free-stream velocity ͑10 l / min͒ and groove pitch 110 m for all three cases with different oil phases ͑20, 50, and 84 cP͒. This technique is expected to serve as a platform for dropletbased reaction systems, particularly with regard to monitoring cell behavior, in vitro expression, and possibly even micropolymerase chain reaction chambers.
“…Details of the device operation and microfabrication processes are described elsewhere. 33 Characterization of the droplet formation and ejection physics, using stroboscopic visualization and scaling analysis has previously been conducted. 34 Finally, the AMUSE has recently been demonstrated as a "soft" ion source for bioanalytical mass spectrometry, 15,20,21 including investigations into charge separation 18 and droplet charging under static and dynamic electric fields.…”
“…33,34 Again, an electric field in the region of droplet pinch-off is used to control the transport of charge into a forming droplet. 17,18 In these applications, precise control over droplet charging is imperative.…”
Distinct regimes of droplet charging, determined by the dominant charge transport process, are identified for an ultrasonic droplet ejector using electrohydrodynamic computational simulations, a fundamental scale analysis, and experimental measurements. The regimes of droplet charging are determined by the relative magnitudes of the dimensionless Strouhal and electric Reynolds numbers, which are a function of the process ͑pressure forcing͒, advection, and charge relaxation time scales for charge transport. Optimal ͑net maximum͒ droplet charging has been identified to exist for conditions in which the electric Reynolds number is of the order of the inverse Strouhal number, i.e., the charge relaxation time is on the order of the pressure forcing ͑droplet formation͒ time scale. The conditions necessary for optimal droplet charging have been identified as a function of the dimensionless Debye number ͑i.e., liquid conductivity͒, external electric field ͑magnitude and duration͒, and atomization drive signal ͑frequency and amplitude͒. The specific regime of droplet charging also determines the functional relationship between droplet charge and charging electric field strength. The commonly expected linear relationship between droplet charge and external electric field strength is only found when either the inverse of the Strouhal number is less than the electric Reynolds number, i.e., the charge relaxation is slower than both the advection and external pressure forcing, or in the electrostatic limit, i.e., when charge relaxation is much faster than all other processes. The analysis provides a basic understanding of the dominant physics of droplet charging with implications to many important applications, such as electrospray mass spectrometry, ink jet printing, and drop-on-demand manufacturing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.