2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2012.00906.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microhabitat Variation Explains Local‐scale Distribution of Terrestrial Amazonian Lizards in Rondônia, Western Brazil

Abstract: We investigate the role of ecology and phylogeny in the association between lizard abundance and microhabitat variables in an Amazon rain forest site. Using pitfall trap arrays, we collected data from 349 individuals belonging to 23 lizard species. After accounting for spatial autocorrelation and using a canonical correspondence analysis (CCA), we found that lizard captures were significantly associated with microhabitat variables, which accounted for 48 percent of the observed variation. Furthermore, a canoni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(98 reference statements)
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, Blevins & With , Garda et al . ). Explanations for the opposite trend are less straightforward and generally involve ad hoc hypotheses (Andersson et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, Blevins & With , Garda et al . ). Explanations for the opposite trend are less straightforward and generally involve ad hoc hypotheses (Andersson et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For instance, smaller fragments are more susceptible to edge effects, and a greater proportion of total area is affected by climatic and biotic influences from the surrounding matrix, resulting in modified microhabitats, which can significantly affect the occurrence of lizards in tropical forests (Garda et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, topographical characteristics, soil composition and microhabitat variation influence the distribution of plants (Schietti et al ., ; Emílio et al ., ; Zuquim et al ., ). As well as these variables, distance to streams (Fraga et al ., ; Menin et al ., ), forest type (Gascon et al ., ; Pavan, ; Garda et al ., ) and leaf‐litter morphology (Menin et al ., ) all influence amphibian and squamate distribution. However, the overall difficulty researchers have faced in detecting general patterns suggests that the relationship between ecological factors and distributional patterns is idiosyncratic (Dias‐Terceiro et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structurally depauperate habitats tend to have lower reptile diversity in general, including reptile predators (Price et al, 2010;Garda et al, 2013). For example, snakes were much less common in cheat grass-invaded sagebrush habitats than in uninvaded habitats (Hall et al, 2009).…”
Section: Mechanisms Influencing the Abundance And Richness Of Reptilesmentioning
confidence: 99%