2019
DOI: 10.1002/qj.3451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfronts in the nocturnal boundary layer

Abstract: Previous studies of submeso motions in the nocturnal boundary layer have concentrated on wave‐like motions. Our study concentrates on common microfronts by analyzing three contrasting datasets. Passage of warm microfronts lead to increased wind speed, increased turbulent intensity and decreased stratification. These events have been previously examined indirectly in terms of patches of warmer turbulent air as part of turbulent intermittency. Cold microfronts generally lead to less turbulence mixing and greater… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The circumstance that the COSMO-CLM model, which was utilized with a horizontal grid resolution of 3 km performs better with regard to the wind-direction (BIAS) in the Feldbach region than GRAMM-SCI using a resolution of 200 m, is probably due to the underlying comparison with gridded data from WPG and not with the observations themselves. As mentioned before, observed wind directions often exhibit a large variability in low-wind speed conditions, which cannot be captured by mesoscale models (e.g., [37]).…”
Section: Wind Speed and Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The circumstance that the COSMO-CLM model, which was utilized with a horizontal grid resolution of 3 km performs better with regard to the wind-direction (BIAS) in the Feldbach region than GRAMM-SCI using a resolution of 200 m, is probably due to the underlying comparison with gridded data from WPG and not with the observations themselves. As mentioned before, observed wind directions often exhibit a large variability in low-wind speed conditions, which cannot be captured by mesoscale models (e.g., [37]).…”
Section: Wind Speed and Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any field site with a similar geometry featuring a valley deep enough to provide some mechanical sheltering and with a relatively pronounced elevation change of 6 • at the shoulder can potentially form TSFs. As an example, Mahrt (2019) describes submeso motions at three different field sites including TSFs within the SCP experiment.…”
Section: Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this definition, a range of motions fall into this category including meandering, solitary waves, gravity waves, wave-like motions, and microfronts. The detection of submeso motions is usually performed based on tower data by analyzing case studies of meandering (Cava et al 2019a), by using the Haar-wavelet (Mahrt 2019), by analyzing spectra and thus their temporal scale (Stiperski and Calaf 2018), by identifying meandering with autocorrelation functions (Anfossi et al 2005), or by using autocorrelation functions to determine oscillations within several parameters, like horizontal and vertical wind speed, temperature, and other scalars (Kang et al 2014(Kang et al , 2015Mortarini et al 2017;Stefanello et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their spatio-temporal scales and origin are not generalized, but a multitude of processes are commonly lumped under the denomination of sub-mesoscale motions. Besides meandering, sub-mesoscale motions can include internal gravity waves (Zaitseva et al 2018), density currents (Sun et al 2002), drainage flows (Mahrt et al 2001), or microfronts (Mahrt 2019). While parametrizing these scales is challenging due to partly unknown physics, exploratory data analysis can help to discover new concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%