1987
DOI: 10.1017/s0016756800016666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfossils and Precambrian–Cambrian boundary stratigraphy at Maldeota, Lesser Himalaya

Abstract: An assemblage of problematical microfossils of Precambrian-Cambrian boundary age is redescribed from the Chert-Phosphorite Member, at the base of the Lower Tal Formation of Maldeota in the Lesser Himalaya of India. This assemblage has previously been ascribed to various ages, from Precambrian to Cretaceous, but is held by us to contain: Maldeotaia bandalica, Protohertzina anabarica group, trumpet-shaped elements, acicular elements A & B, IConotheca sp., Ovalitheca cf. multicostata, allathecid sp. A, Barbitosit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, despite concerted efforts, no small shelly fossils, conodonts or other Phanerozoic microfossils (or macrofossils) have been recovered from the Birmania Formation to date. As shelly fossils are common in Phanerozoic phosphorites, notably in the Cambrian Tarnawai and Tal formations in the Himalaya (Mostler, 1980;Bhatt et al, 1983;Brasier and Singh, 1987), they would be expected to be present if the Birmania Formation is Cambrian or younger. Thirdly, although some Cambrian or younger sandstones from Rajasthan may lack Cambrian-aged zircon grains, out of eight biostratigraphically constrained Cambrian sandstone samples with published detrital zircon ages (including one from Rajasthan) only one sample, from the Lesser Himalaya, is known to lack latest Neoproterozoic or early Cambrian age grains.…”
Section: Interpretation and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, despite concerted efforts, no small shelly fossils, conodonts or other Phanerozoic microfossils (or macrofossils) have been recovered from the Birmania Formation to date. As shelly fossils are common in Phanerozoic phosphorites, notably in the Cambrian Tarnawai and Tal formations in the Himalaya (Mostler, 1980;Bhatt et al, 1983;Brasier and Singh, 1987), they would be expected to be present if the Birmania Formation is Cambrian or younger. Thirdly, although some Cambrian or younger sandstones from Rajasthan may lack Cambrian-aged zircon grains, out of eight biostratigraphically constrained Cambrian sandstone samples with published detrital zircon ages (including one from Rajasthan) only one sample, from the Lesser Himalaya, is known to lack latest Neoproterozoic or early Cambrian age grains.…”
Section: Interpretation and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11, panel 56), which occurs at the base of the Nemakit-Daldyn Horizon (Missarzhevsky, 1973). Protohertzina was widespread over the entire Siberian Plat- form, and in Kazakhstan, Mongolia, China, the Lesser Himalayas, and western North America (Conway Morris and Fritz, 1980;Missarzhevsky and Mambetov, 1981;Luo et al, 1984;Nowlan et at, 1985;Brasier and Singh, 1987;Hamdi, 1989). In the Maly Karatau , Mountain Shoria, and Mongolia, Proto hertz ina cultrata Missarzhevsky occurs up to the Botomian.…”
Section: Conodontomorphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67B, E, G) lack longitudinal striation. H. insolitus or similar tubes with transversal annulation and longitudinal stiation are also reported from the lower Cambrian of India (Brasier and Singh 1987), South China (Esakova and Zhegallo 1996), Australia (Skovsted and Peel 2011), lower-middle Cambrian of Laurentia (Skovsted and Holmer 2006), and middle-upper Cambrian of Kazakhstan (Esakova and Zhegallo 1996).…”
Section: Class Edrioasteroidea Billings 1858mentioning
confidence: 72%