2017
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b07735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidization of Graphite and Formulation of Graphene-Based Conductive Inks

Abstract: We report the exfoliation of graphite in aqueous solutions under high shear rate [∼ 108 s–1] turbulent flow conditions, with a 100% exfoliation yield. The material is stabilized without centrifugation at concentrations up to 100 g/L using carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt to formulate conductive printable inks. The sheet resistance of blade coated films is below ∼2Ω/□. This is a simple and scalable production route for conductive inks for large-area printing in flexible electronics.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
276
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(255 reference statements)
3
276
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, alternative available exfoliation methods display lower production capabilities. For example, liquid phase exfoliation (LPE) typically has a production capability of less than 0.1 g h −1 , planetary ball milling methods around 1 g h −1 , and microfluidization less than 1 g h −1 . Therefore, the production of the sulfur–carbon composite active material with WJM graphene is cheap (at the end of the process the solvent is recyclable and reusable), environmentally friendly, and gives a high yield (i.e., 99.9 %), meeting all the requirements for commercialization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, alternative available exfoliation methods display lower production capabilities. For example, liquid phase exfoliation (LPE) typically has a production capability of less than 0.1 g h −1 , planetary ball milling methods around 1 g h −1 , and microfluidization less than 1 g h −1 . Therefore, the production of the sulfur–carbon composite active material with WJM graphene is cheap (at the end of the process the solvent is recyclable and reusable), environmentally friendly, and gives a high yield (i.e., 99.9 %), meeting all the requirements for commercialization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…)over the past few years can be applied in as traightforward manner. This includes scale up of the exfoliation for example by shear exfoliation, [29b] ball milling [35] or microfluidization [36] to increase the accessible quantities of the exfoliated sheets and enable further solution processing and printing. [37] Possibly, ac ombination of different exfoliation strategies based on both chemical (intercalation) and mechanical exfoliation mediated through various sources on energy input can result in al arger population of large and thin sheets in the sample (even though this has currently not been demonstrated for other layered crystals).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scalable process, the remaining non‐exfoliated graphite particles were separated in a subsequent centrifugation step (200 g for 100 min) to produce a mixture of mono‐ and multilayer graphene with a sheet width of 300–800 nm . Moreover, a microfluidizer with much higher shear rates of 10 8 s −1 afforded aqueous graphene dispersions . According to Ferrari et al., 100 microfluidization cycles in the presence of a surfactant gave 100% exfoliation and enabled the fabrications of printing inks without requiring the second centrifugation step when fairly large amounts of carboxymethyl cellulose were added as dispersing agent .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a microfluidizer with much higher shear rates of 10 8 s −1 afforded aqueous graphene dispersions . According to Ferrari et al., 100 microfluidization cycles in the presence of a surfactant gave 100% exfoliation and enabled the fabrications of printing inks without requiring the second centrifugation step when fairly large amounts of carboxymethyl cellulose were added as dispersing agent . The disadvantage of this method is the use of surfactants and the high number of cycles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%