2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic wound scratching platform based on an untethered microrobot with magnetic actuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that the geometry of CFZs in the existing CMA is a two-dimensional area, which does not represent the complexity of the real situation of the wound, which says that the depth of the wound matters in vivo. In a pilot study by [ 32 ], a robotic device was developed to create CFZs at different geometric shapes including line, crosshead, rectangle, and triangle shapes (see Figure 2 in Section 2.1.1 ). However, this device has limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth mentioning that the geometry of CFZs in the existing CMA is a two-dimensional area, which does not represent the complexity of the real situation of the wound, which says that the depth of the wound matters in vivo. In a pilot study by [ 32 ], a robotic device was developed to create CFZs at different geometric shapes including line, crosshead, rectangle, and triangle shapes (see Figure 2 in Section 2.1.1 ). However, this device has limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the device has a limitation in the shear stress condition. In the study of [ 32 ], the mechanical force on the cells was created by magnetic force. The magnetic force can be decomposed into the vertical force to apply pressure on cells, and horizontal force to drag the device moving (see Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations