2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26829-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic preparation of monodisperse polymeric microspheres coated with silica nanoparticles

Abstract: The synthesis of organic-inorganic hybrid particles with highly controlled particle sizes in the micrometer range is a major challenge in many areas of research. Conventional methods are limited for nanometer-scale fabrication because of the difficulty in controlling the size. In this study, we present a microfluidic method for the preparation of organic-inorganic hybrid microparticles with poly (1,10-decanediol dimethacrylate-co-trimethoxysillyl propyl methacrylate) (P (DDMA-co-TPM)) as the core and silica na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, when microfluidic platforms are used as microreactors, they provide improved space-time yields (product formed per reactor volume and time), producing faster reactions than bulk counterparts. Moreover, the degree of control over local environmental conditions is such to guarantee homogeneous products [33][34][35][36] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, when microfluidic platforms are used as microreactors, they provide improved space-time yields (product formed per reactor volume and time), producing faster reactions than bulk counterparts. Moreover, the degree of control over local environmental conditions is such to guarantee homogeneous products [33][34][35][36] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While microfluidics approaches have been used for successfully fabrication of two‐phase systems (Choi et al, ; Ma et al, ), we opted to not use a microfluidic approach initially for the proof‐of‐concept because: (a) generally the size of phase‐separated particles used within such systems range from 0.01–200 μm (Ekanem, Nabavi, Vladisavljevic, & Gu, ; Karnik et al, ; Kim et al, ; Seo et al, ), which would likely require many dozens of the same particles to be delivered, potentially leading to self‐aggregation and undesirable and unpredictable kinetics; (b) the amount of drug in contact with an organic solvent is far higher (Figure S1), which would increase the cost of the system due to cargo denaturation issues; and (c) the diameter of microfluidic‐formed approaches generally result in more of a continuous release fashion, which may result in T cell anergy. In the future, we plan to investigate macrofluidic approaches, as opposed to microfluidics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing novel platforms for biomedical, diagnostic, biosensing, and monitoring purposes is an unprecedented opportunity microfluidic‐based devices have offered. Precise control over the geometries of the chips and flow rates of fluids of different phases, presented by microfluidic devices, enables the generation of uniform, highly stable, mono‐dispersed particles with improved encapsulation turnover (Kim et al, 2018; Xu et al, 2005). On that account, unique advantages in developing prompt drug screening techniques with optimized CFPS, and efficacious drug carriers are offered by microfluidic devices (Damiati, Kompella, Damiati, & Kodzius, 2018).…”
Section: Cfps: From Test Tube Reactions To Cell‐free Expression In MImentioning
confidence: 99%