2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.07.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic preparation and self diffusion PFG-NMR analysis of monodisperse water-in-oil-in-water double emulsions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this case the two distinct droplet populations, both of which do not change with either position or time as shown in Fig. 8, are indicative of the formation of a multiple emulsion (Hughes et al 2013) in the form of a water-in-oil-in-water emulsion. Such emulsion microstructures are encouraged by the presence of different surfactants in the mixture that stabilise water and oil droplets, respectively (Neumann et al 2018).…”
Section: Droplet Size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, in this case the two distinct droplet populations, both of which do not change with either position or time as shown in Fig. 8, are indicative of the formation of a multiple emulsion (Hughes et al 2013) in the form of a water-in-oil-in-water emulsion. Such emulsion microstructures are encouraged by the presence of different surfactants in the mixture that stabilise water and oil droplets, respectively (Neumann et al 2018).…”
Section: Droplet Size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…As mentioned earlier, the straight-through microchannel device was used for the first production of W/O/W emulsions made of food grade components [ 23 ], although this first attempt resulted in poorly controlled internal water droplets. Another microchannel production of W/O/W emulsions was achieved using a glass device that allowed control over the number of internal water droplets and the external oil droplet size, as shown in Figure 3 [ 33 ]. The authors connected a hydrophobic device and a hydrophilic device and, through variation of process conditions, were able to vary the number of droplets.…”
Section: Microfluidic Fabrication Of Food Dropletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Examples of monodisperse W/O/W emulsions produced in a glass microchannel device (top) or in a glass capillary device (bottom, a – d ). Reprinted from [ 33 ] and [ 36 ], respectively, with permission from Elsevier. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 However, a single step process that combines microfluidic drop generation and in-situ shell polymerisation in the collection channel is highly preferred for continuous production of capsules. In addition, although there are several studies on the effect of osmotic pressure imbalance on the stability of core-shell drops and capsules with hard shells, [30][31][32] the effect is yet to be investigated for capsules with elastic shells, where the osmotic pressure gradient across the shell can dramatically change the morphology of the capsules and encapsulation efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%