2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2019.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic platforms for cell cultures and investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
95
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
0
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cultures have been mainly carried out on 2D platforms, such as petri dishes, microtiter plates, and flasks, in which the organisms are placed onto a flat surface that is different from in vivo 3D environment [2]. Although the conventional 2D culture techniques generated a wealth of new scientific and technological results with significant and transformative potential, they fail to provide an accurate structure, function, or physiology of living organisms and even worse can alter their gene expression, metabolism, production, and morphology compared to those in 3D [1][2][3][4]. These organisms inherently respond to a variety of chemical and physical cues from their 3D microenvironment differently than 2D cues while performing the fundamental cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and migration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cultures have been mainly carried out on 2D platforms, such as petri dishes, microtiter plates, and flasks, in which the organisms are placed onto a flat surface that is different from in vivo 3D environment [2]. Although the conventional 2D culture techniques generated a wealth of new scientific and technological results with significant and transformative potential, they fail to provide an accurate structure, function, or physiology of living organisms and even worse can alter their gene expression, metabolism, production, and morphology compared to those in 3D [1][2][3][4]. These organisms inherently respond to a variety of chemical and physical cues from their 3D microenvironment differently than 2D cues while performing the fundamental cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and migration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-throughput culturing tools and trapping methods for C. elegans have historically developed separately, and the techniques developed for those applications are usually incompatible with each other [11,12]. Even the latest advances in a 3D controlled environment do not accurately replicate their natural habitats and do not show any significant difference in culturing compared to the standard 2D method [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in organs‐on‐chips, the right choice of surface functionalization method provides the means for culturing the desired cells in 2D or 3D and achieving fully confluent functional cells in a short time frame . Biofunctionalization techniques in microfluidic channels determine the durability and stability of the final product against temperature, harsh chemical conditions and degradation as well as high shear forces …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of MBR systems have in the past been used for high throughput screening, strain engineering and bioprocess development . To closely mimic the microenvironment of cells, the design of MBR can be tailored for specific applications, including cytotoxicity testing and drug development . In a microfluidic setup, they are also used as cell culturing and analytical devices, in clinical embryology or tissue engineering .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] To closely mimic the microenvironment of cells, the design of MBR can be tailored for specific applications, including cytotoxicity testing and drug development. 11,12 In a microfluidic setup, they are also used as cell culturing and analytical devices, in clinical embryology or tissue engineering. 13,14 Nowadays, advancing developments in manufacturing techniques enable increasingly smaller reactor setups to optimally use the advantages of miniaturization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%