2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.01.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic extraction and digital quantification of circulating cell-free DNA from serum

Abstract: Miniaturized devices for the extraction of DNA have been used for assessing genetic material in biological, forensic and environmental samples. However, the ability to isolate trace amounts of highly fragmented DNA from biological fluids remains a challenge. The current work reports a microfluidic approach that combines on line a dynamic magnetic extraction procedure with droplet-based digital PCR (ddPCR). This strategy maximizes the surface area for DNA binding within the chip, in order to capture short DNA f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Influenza A virus [69,72] Mucosal lining or Nasopharyngeal fluids DNA Bacillus anthracis [25] Bordetella pertussis [44] Mycobacterium tuberculosis [53,63] Staphylococcus aureus [56,68] Bacillus cereus [66] RNA Human immunodeficiency virus [66] Parainfluenza virus, Rhinovirus A, Metapneumovirus [30] Respiratory-syncytial virus [30,70] Multiple respiratory RNA viruses [71] SARS-CoV-2 Although more often used for detection of proteins, metabolites or other small molecules, extraction LOCs can also be helpful in genetic disease detection [104], usually performed through DNA offline extraction followed by sequencing or genotyping approaches. More recently, LOCs were designed to capture circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) from serum samples of cancer patients [105][106][107]: ccfDNA capture requires increased ability in adsorbing short fragments, thus implying customized isolation strategies [19]. Another interesting application of DNA extracted with LOCs is represented by forensic evaluations, especially when available sample volumes are extremely low [9,24,29,75].…”
Section: Sfts Virus [58]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Influenza A virus [69,72] Mucosal lining or Nasopharyngeal fluids DNA Bacillus anthracis [25] Bordetella pertussis [44] Mycobacterium tuberculosis [53,63] Staphylococcus aureus [56,68] Bacillus cereus [66] RNA Human immunodeficiency virus [66] Parainfluenza virus, Rhinovirus A, Metapneumovirus [30] Respiratory-syncytial virus [30,70] Multiple respiratory RNA viruses [71] SARS-CoV-2 Although more often used for detection of proteins, metabolites or other small molecules, extraction LOCs can also be helpful in genetic disease detection [104], usually performed through DNA offline extraction followed by sequencing or genotyping approaches. More recently, LOCs were designed to capture circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) from serum samples of cancer patients [105][106][107]: ccfDNA capture requires increased ability in adsorbing short fragments, thus implying customized isolation strategies [19]. Another interesting application of DNA extracted with LOCs is represented by forensic evaluations, especially when available sample volumes are extremely low [9,24,29,75].…”
Section: Sfts Virus [58]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36] Toralla et al developed an integrated microfluidic magnetic extraction platform (METRO) for cfDNA isolation from biological samples such as undiluted serum. [37] The capture domain of the microfluidic platform was equipped with paramagnetic microparticles which can be expanded by flowing binding buffer (pH < 6) through the channel. Furthermore, the orientation and porosity of the microparticles were tunable by an external magnetic field and fluid flow rate.…”
Section: Na Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such DNA extraction method in a segmented flow microfluidic system successfully removed 90% or even 95% of the original sample volume. More recently, magnetic bead-based approach has been applied to cfDNA isolation (Figure 2), with a constant position of external magnetic field and without the need for an incubation step, which had comparable efficiencies with standard column-based method [38,39]. The emergence of new technology, like 3D-printing, makes magnetic bead-based microdevices more diversified [40].…”
Section: Collection and Enrichment Of Cfdnamentioning
confidence: 99%