2011
DOI: 10.1039/c0nj00709a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic devices as tools for mimicking the in vivo environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
(248 reference statements)
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One promising approach for the realization of such predictive in vitro experiments is microfluidics [18,19]. There are already a broad range of experimental settings in which such an approach is used, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One promising approach for the realization of such predictive in vitro experiments is microfluidics [18,19]. There are already a broad range of experimental settings in which such an approach is used, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 Some devices were recently used for drug testing on carcinoma spheroids. [15][16][17] Coculture spheroids for investigating cell-cell interactions in a 3D environment have also been implemented. 18,19 Delicately designed microfluidic devices can provide continuous medium perfusion and better oxygen exchange for spheroid culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confocal laser microscopy and flow cytometry data indicated that TK-FITC could specifically recognize Caco-2 cells and has a high affinity for Caco-2 cells (Figure 3). However, in vivo and in vitro environments are significantly different (Ziolkowska et al, 2011); thus, it is difficult to extrapolate data from in vitro experiments to possible effects in vivo (Yamada & Cukierman, 2007). Consequently, a mimicking in vivo circumstance technique is necessary to investigate the targeting of this ligand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%