2017
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.2576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic device‐assisted etching of p‐HEMA for cell or protein patterning

Abstract: The construction of biomaterials with which to limit the growth of cells or to limit the adsorption of proteins is essential for understanding biological phenomena. Here, we describe a novel method to simply and easily create thin layers of poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (p-HEMA) for protein and cellular patterning via etching with ethanol and microfluidic devices. First, a cell culture surface or glass coverslip is coated with p-HEMA. Next, a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic is placed onto the p-H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes, for example, active cell-patterning methods that use microfluidic (16,17), acoustic (18,19), or dielectrophoretic forces to manipulate cells (20,21). Similarly, indirect capture methods that modulate surface chemistries through either surface charge (22,23) or the selective deposition of cell-adhesive/resistive materials (24)(25)(26) are limited to patterning only one or two cellular components. On the other hand, direct-deposition methods that are capable of recreating multifactorial signaling scenarios-such as ink-jet printing (27), dip-pen lithography (28,29), and robotic-spot microarray technologies (30)(31)(32)-often sacrifice micrometer-scale spatial resolution and/ or throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes, for example, active cell-patterning methods that use microfluidic (16,17), acoustic (18,19), or dielectrophoretic forces to manipulate cells (20,21). Similarly, indirect capture methods that modulate surface chemistries through either surface charge (22,23) or the selective deposition of cell-adhesive/resistive materials (24)(25)(26) are limited to patterning only one or two cellular components. On the other hand, direct-deposition methods that are capable of recreating multifactorial signaling scenarios-such as ink-jet printing (27), dip-pen lithography (28,29), and robotic-spot microarray technologies (30)(31)(32)-often sacrifice micrometer-scale spatial resolution and/ or throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%