“…Thee lectrochemical performances of as-prepared FSCs are evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) measurements.A ss hown in Figure 4a (Supporting Information, Figures S21-S23), the CV profiles of bulk boron FSC exhibits the smallest integral area with ar ectangular shape,i ndicating the lowest energy storage ability of electric double-layer capacitance (EDLC). [37] In contrast, the boron nanosheets FSC noteworthily shows alarger CV integral area, which implies that the gas-phase exfoliated boron nanosheets with graphene-like lamellar structure can effectively improve the EDLC.M ore importantly,b yd esigning the anisotropic and ordered hetero-nanosheets,the ABCNs FSC displays the highest CV integral area, which reveals the greatest ion migration and charge-storage capabilities.T here are faint redox reactions of CV curve derived from the nitrogen activity in doped carbon nanosheets. [32] Additionally,t he ABCNs FSC also presents the longest charging/discharging times than those of bulk boron and boron nanosheets FSCs (Figure 4b;S upporting Information, Figures S24-S26), demonstrating the best interfacial charge transfer and electrochemical performance.T he detailed specific volumetric capacitances of the as-prepared FSCs at different current densities are shown in Figure 4c.Obviously,the ABCNs FSC performs the largest specific capacitance of 534.5 Fcm À3 at ac urrent density of 0.1 Acm À3 ,w hich makes as ignificant promotion compared with bulk boron and boron nanosheets of 174.2 and 310 Fcm À3 ,respectively.T he coulombic efficien- Figure S27.…”