2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10544-016-0121-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic advances in phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing

Abstract: A strong natural selection for microbial antibiotic resistance has resulted from the extensive use and misuse of antibiotics. Though multiple factors are responsible for this crisis, the most significant factor – widespread prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics – is largely driven by the fact that the standard process for determining antibiotic susceptibility includes a 1–2-day culture period, resulting in 48–72 hours from patient sample to final determination. Clearly, disruptive approaches, rather than … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semi-automated susceptibility systems (such as VITEK and MicroScan) decrease the turn-around-time and operator touch-time (culture and colony isolation are still required) compared to traditional culture-based methods, but can add significant cost to the tests [132]. The fastest test still requires 9 h and, therefore, these semi-automated systems do not provide information in time to influence initial treatment decisions [133,134].…”
Section: Microfluidics For Antifungal Susceptibility Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Semi-automated susceptibility systems (such as VITEK and MicroScan) decrease the turn-around-time and operator touch-time (culture and colony isolation are still required) compared to traditional culture-based methods, but can add significant cost to the tests [132]. The fastest test still requires 9 h and, therefore, these semi-automated systems do not provide information in time to influence initial treatment decisions [133,134].…”
Section: Microfluidics For Antifungal Susceptibility Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since microfluidics promises several advantages over existing macro-scale methods, several microfluidic platforms that can perform rapid antimicrobial susceptibility tests have been developed during the last years (Table 3) [132,135]. The recent development of microfluidic platforms was mostly focused on devices for antibiotics susceptibility testing and much less on antifungals susceptibility testing, although the same designs could, usually, be used for both (e.g., see [136,137]).…”
Section: Microfluidics For Antifungal Susceptibility Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopy and microfluidics in combination allow for the phenotypic study of individual bacteria or of small bacterial populations in confined volumes 20 . Microfluidic channels handle microliter-sized liquid volumes with microscopic observation routinely possible at the 10-nL scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a number of microscopy-based AST platforms have emerged that monitor small bacterial populations 20 . These methods are based on either direct automated counting of bacterial cells 23 , localized density measurement 24 , or observation of metabolite consumption 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campbell et al . reviewed the most recent advances in microfluidic devices for AST and identification four major strategies: 1) microfluidic incubator platforms; 2) gradient generators; 3) combined assays for identification and AST; and 4) AST based on bacterial death 33 . Several common features emerge from this classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%