2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfludic platforms for the evaluation of anti-platelet agent efficacy under hyper-shear conditions associated with ventricular assist devices

Abstract: Thrombus formation is a major adverse event affecting patients implanted with ventricular assist devices (VADs). Despite anti-thrombotic drug administration, thrombotic events remain frequent within the first year post-implantation. Platelet activation (PA) is an essential process underling thrombotic adverse events in VAD systems. Indeed, abnormal shear forces, correlating with specific flow trajectories of VADs, are strong agonists mediating PA. To date, the ability to determine efficacy of anti-platelet (AP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last few years, the PAS assay has been utilized extensively for in vitro pre‐clinical studies of device‐associated SMPA . However, no studies have utilized the PAS assay for monitoring SMPA in the clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over the last few years, the PAS assay has been utilized extensively for in vitro pre‐clinical studies of device‐associated SMPA . However, no studies have utilized the PAS assay for monitoring SMPA in the clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this study we also set the basis for the future development of a next‐generation point‐of‐care diagnostic device for bedside and/or home‐based antithrombotic therapy monitoring. Our group has recently reported on the development and use of microfluidic technology to address this aim . Such a system will enhance standardization of the method via automating procedural steps, thus reducing the risk of random/systematic users' errors to affect the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8, 50 cells per simulation, 10 simulations per channel) and BDI 1 to BDI 3 (Eqs. [2][3][4]. The ranking of channel quality is the same for all blood damage calculations with a maximum deviation between the calculation schemes of less than 3%.…”
Section: Comparison Of CDI and Bdimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To overcome these limitations, we developed a new computational fluid dynamic-based approach, which allows the design of specific microfluidic channels able to stimulate platelets with dynamic and highly controlled shear stress patterns of differing amplitudes (Dimasi et al, 2015). Utilizing this approach, we demonstrated the feasibility of configuring lFPs to emulate realistic MCSD shear stress conditions (Consolo et al, 2016b); furthermore, these microfluidic platforms were successfully utilized for testing the efficacy of differing antiplatelet agents under hyper-shear conditions (Dimasi et al, 2017). The microfluidic approach, as a result of its ability to employ small sample volumes, its highly controllable working conditions, and the possibility for automation, is an attractive strategy with great potential for precision medicine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%