Microfinance and the Poverty of Financial Services: A Perspective from Indian Experience †

Abstract

The vast network of banking and co-operative finance institutions in India has failed to provide low-income families with significant access to financial services. In this situation, the non-governmental microfinance institutions have attempted to provide an alternative to the high-cost informal financial services that most low-income clients must rely on. The extent to which such service provision is appropriate is discussed in this article using information from the financial histories of low-income families in the slums of Delhi and two villages of one of the more economically backward areas of India. The analysis in the article shows that the needs of low-income clients would be best served by highly flexible financial services that enable the conduct of frequent transactions both for small savings and for borrowing at irregular intervals. In relation to this, both microfinance and formal financial institutions do not fully meet the needs of low-income families. The article concludes with practical suggestions for the design of products and delivery systems to meet these needs.

Microcredit Self-Help Groups for Widowed and Abandoned Women in South India: Do They Help?

“…By 2001 about 800-1,000 NGOs were engaged in implementing savings and microcredit programs for the poor (Sinha & Patole, 2003). These programs offered access to credit and savings services for self-employed livelihood projects to those people who would not qualify for loans using the traditional criteria of collateral (e.g., land or capital).…”

An institutional logics perspective to evolution of Indian microcredit business models

“…This created hybrid logics in all nationalized commercial banks, who had the mandate of being profitable as well as reaching out to the unviable sectors which entailed high transaction costs for small amounts. Policy initiatives, such as directed credit programs, subsidized interest rates, priority sector lending, lead bank scheme, and service area approach, were created mainly to comply with the quantitative targets of poor‐lending, much needed for projecting the social face of these nationalized banks and the State (Sinha & Patole, ). The RBI mandated all commercial banks to have 40% of their loan portfolios invested in the state's priority sectors…”