2015
DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.21.3.235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfabrics-Based Approach to Predict Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Selected Amphibolites Schists Using Fuzzy Inference and Linear Multiple Regression Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) is one of the most important indices in rock mechanical studies, and it is commonly used for a variety of engineering applications such as rock mass classification and rock failure criteria. However, such tests require high-quality core samples which cannot always be obtained, particularly from weak, stratified, highly fractured, and weathered rocks [5]. Thus, many researchers use conventional statistical methods to estimate UCS from simple index parameters such as Schmidt hammer, point load, block punch, and petrographic properties [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) is one of the most important indices in rock mechanical studies, and it is commonly used for a variety of engineering applications such as rock mass classification and rock failure criteria. However, such tests require high-quality core samples which cannot always be obtained, particularly from weak, stratified, highly fractured, and weathered rocks [5]. Thus, many researchers use conventional statistical methods to estimate UCS from simple index parameters such as Schmidt hammer, point load, block punch, and petrographic properties [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such tests require high-quality core samples which cannot always be obtained, particularly from weak, stratified, highly fractured, and weathered rocks [5]. Thus, many researchers use conventional statistical methods to estimate UCS from simple index parameters such as Schmidt hammer, point load, block punch, and petrographic properties [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. UCS was shown to be correlated with some mechanical properties such as point load index, Schmidt hammer rebound number, and Los Angeles degradation abrasion loss [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly measured or estimated mechanical property of rocks is the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS, MPa), as it is a consistent relative measure indicating the resistance of rock materials under axial loading conditions. The UCS varies remarkably with changing parameters such as lithological variances, rock mineralogy, texture, and degree of weathering [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. nevertheless, the deformation properties of rocks (i.e., tangential Young Modulus (E ti , GPa) and tangential Poisson's ratio (v ti )) are other crucial rock properties in performing numerical modelling of rock masses [14][15][16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%