2020
DOI: 10.1080/03949370.2020.1837962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microevolutionary change in mimicry? Potential erosion of rattling behaviour among nonvenomous snakes on islands lacking rattlesnakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore hypothesized that Catalina snakes would exhibit behavioral decrements in rattling, cloacal gland discharge, capture difficulty by a human, biting propensity, and venom expenditure. The findings showing that C. helleri on Isla Coronado Sur appears to be less risk averse and potentially more explorative than mainland counterparts [60], and that non-venomous gopher snakes on two other Channel Islands exhibit a reduced tail vibration defensive response compared to mainland counterparts [61], support our hypothesis. Nevertheless, both natural and introduced snake predators and antagonists exist on Catalina, and these must be taken into consideration when interpreting differences in behavior that might be detected.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…We therefore hypothesized that Catalina snakes would exhibit behavioral decrements in rattling, cloacal gland discharge, capture difficulty by a human, biting propensity, and venom expenditure. The findings showing that C. helleri on Isla Coronado Sur appears to be less risk averse and potentially more explorative than mainland counterparts [60], and that non-venomous gopher snakes on two other Channel Islands exhibit a reduced tail vibration defensive response compared to mainland counterparts [61], support our hypothesis. Nevertheless, both natural and introduced snake predators and antagonists exist on Catalina, and these must be taken into consideration when interpreting differences in behavior that might be detected.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%