1983
DOI: 10.2307/3576251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microdosimetric Properties of Alpha-Particle Tracks Measured in a Low-Pressure Cloud Chamber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nuclear emulsions have been employed for studies of track struc- ture [14,15], but they do not have sufficient resolution to represent individual ionizations. Somewhat better resolution has been obtained with the more sensitive cloud chamber, which permits a fairly accurate visualization of the tracks, at least of sparsely ionizing particles [16]. However, the only common and practicable method for obtaining geometric representations of charged particle tracks is Monte Carlo simulation on the basis of known and interpolated collision cross sections.…”
Section: Nature Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear emulsions have been employed for studies of track struc- ture [14,15], but they do not have sufficient resolution to represent individual ionizations. Somewhat better resolution has been obtained with the more sensitive cloud chamber, which permits a fairly accurate visualization of the tracks, at least of sparsely ionizing particles [16]. However, the only common and practicable method for obtaining geometric representations of charged particle tracks is Monte Carlo simulation on the basis of known and interpolated collision cross sections.…”
Section: Nature Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a large extent the cloud chamber is an ideal microdosimetric device: by measuring the positions of ionising events in charged-particle tracks one can generate-with a flexibility matched only by Monte Carlo simulations-any microdosimetric quantity of interest, ranging from lineal energy spectra (in volumes of practically arbitrary shape and size) to proximity functions, that is, distributions of distances between energy transfer points in the track. Cloud-chamber data analysed in such ways have been indeed reported for a variety of radiations (Budd and Marshall 1983, Marshall er a1 1985, Budd et a1 1983, Budd and Marshall 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Recent publications from the Harwell grolup (Budd and Marshall 1983, Marshall et a1 1985, Budd et a1 1983, Budd and Marshall 1980) report one-dimensional root mean square diffusion distances of 4 nm and 3.5 nm in water vapour and tissueequivalent gas mixture, respectively. The spatial resolution in the proximity functions (or'interdroplet distance distributions, as they are called in these papers) is 0.5 nm in unit density (1 g water.…”
Section: Practical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Single track effects were calculated separately for the alpha-particles and 7 Li-ions. Experimental measurements [30,31] as well as numerical [18,32,33] and Monte-Carlo calculations [34,35] suggest a 1/r 2 -dependence for the radial dose distribution D (r) inside the particle track. The track structure model of Butts and Katz [18] has been developed as a parametric description to fit experimental data measured at different energies.…”
Section: Model Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%