2017
DOI: 10.1002/mp.12583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microdosimetric measurements of a clinical proton beam with micrometer‐sized solid‐state detector

Abstract: Purpose: Microdosimetry is a vital tool for assessing the microscopic patterns of energy deposition by radiation, which ultimately govern biological effect. Solid-state, silicon-on-insulator microdosimeters offer an approach for making microdosimetric measurements with high spatial resolution (on the order of tens of micrometers). These high-resolution, solid-state microdosimeters may therefore play a useful role in characterizing proton radiotherapy fields, particularly for making highly resolved measurements… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
12
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not calibrated with the energy and therefore not directly comparable to related microdosimeters responses, a general trend can be observed in which there is an increase in pulse‐height (lineal energy) at higher energies (distal part) for the Bragg peak. However, this similar behavior of the scCVD diamond membrane based microdosimeters can be also observed for known measurements obtained from TEPC and silicon dosimeters, which demonstrates the microdosimeter's ability to measure microdosimetric quantities in clinical ion beams.…”
Section: Results IIsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Although not calibrated with the energy and therefore not directly comparable to related microdosimeters responses, a general trend can be observed in which there is an increase in pulse‐height (lineal energy) at higher energies (distal part) for the Bragg peak. However, this similar behavior of the scCVD diamond membrane based microdosimeters can be also observed for known measurements obtained from TEPC and silicon dosimeters, which demonstrates the microdosimeter's ability to measure microdosimetric quantities in clinical ion beams.…”
Section: Results IIsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Modeling the LET distributions of collimated pMBRT beams, particularly by taking secondaries into account, may therefore be useful for interpretation of radiobiological experiments, as a LET‐RBE (Relative Biological Effectiveness) relationship has often been described . An accurate quantification of these physical quantities should be the subject of a future study, especially since the measurement of lineal energy distributions with new solid‐state (silicon or diamond) microdosimeters now appears to be accessible . Lastly, EUD corrections could also be recommended when evaluating and comparing uniform with spatially fractionated irradiation geometries …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 An accurate quantification of these physical quantities should be the subject of a future study, especially since the measurement of lineal energy distributions with new solid-state (silicon or diamond) microdosimeters now appears to be accessible. 52 Lastly, EUD corrections could also be recommended when evaluating and comparing uniform with spatially fractionated irradiation geometries. 53 A particularly interesting potential clinical application of pMBRT irradiations with pencil beam scanning would be management of intra-fraction motion during treatment delivery, as hypofractionation is typically a key objective of pMBRT (a few tens of grays per fraction, 5,6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are reported in the Supplementary Data. Recently, a series of microdosimetric measurements were conducted by Anderson et al[29] where they measured ‫ݕ‬ at various depths along a 71.3 MeV and 159.9 MeV proton beam and compared those measurements to calculations of LET D . They found a similar, linear relationship between LET D and ‫ݕ‬ , and our values of ‫ݕ‬ at similar LET D are similar to theirs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%